Description of problem: We should add a check for yajl (/usr/bin/json_verify) to run-tests.sh, in order to pro-actively warn people it's needed. Otherwise some tests (meta.t at least) will fail: ./tests/basic/../include.rc: line 166: /usr/bin/json_verify: No such file or directory ./tests/basic/../include.rc: line 166: /usr/bin/json_verify: No such file or directory ./tests/basic/../include.rc: line 166: /usr/bin/json_verify: No such file or directory [01:26:55] ./tests/basic/meta.t .............................. not ok 10 not ok 11 not ok 12 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Upstream GlusterFS git repo, master branch, as of Fri 13th June 2014. How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run run-tests.sh without yajl (/usr/bin/json_verify) installed. 2. The basic/meta.t test will fail
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/8054 (tests: add missing check for yajl to run-tests.sh) posted (#1) for review on master by Justin Clift (justin)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/8054 (tests: add missing check for yajl to run-tests.sh) posted (#2) for review on master by Justin Clift (justin)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/8054 committed in master by Vijay Bellur (vbellur) ------ commit 053389c89eb1c1937e795dd52f7c10a4a295b707 Author: Justin Clift <justin> Date: Fri Jun 13 03:33:51 2014 +0100 tests: add missing check for yajl to run-tests.sh Also add it to the regression test Requires line, along with other missing dependencies. Change-Id: I2a83eb6797bafe8883d90565bb4c1ab93c074644 BUG: 1108958 Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/8054 Reviewed-by: Harshavardhana <harsha> Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur>
A beta release for GlusterFS 3.6.0 has been released. Please verify if the release solves this bug report for you. In case the glusterfs-3.6.0beta1 release does not have a resolution for this issue, leave a comment in this bug and move the status to ASSIGNED. If this release fixes the problem for you, leave a note and change the status to VERIFIED. Packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update (possibly an "updates-testing" repository) infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2014-September/018836.html [2] http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.6.1, please reopen this bug report. glusterfs-3.6.1 has been announced [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2014-November/019410.html [2] http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users