Bug 1109417 - Adding a new Security Rule to a Security Group shouldn't remove the sort on the table
Summary: Adding a new Security Rule to a Security Group shouldn't remove the sort on t...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: python-django-horizon
Version: 4.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: z1
: 5.0 (RHEL 7)
Assignee: Julie Pichon
QA Contact: Ido Ovadia
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: RHELOSP-RHCI
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-06-13 19:49 UTC by Matt Reid
Modified: 2022-07-09 07:00 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-django-horizon-2014.1.2-1.el7ost
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-09-30 17:18:43 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Default view of ports in an Icehouse instance (52.91 KB, image/png)
2014-06-13 19:50 UTC, Matt Reid
no flags Details
Same rules as other Icehouse instance, default view when you open up the group (61.54 KB, image/png)
2014-06-13 19:50 UTC, Matt Reid
no flags Details
What is the sort here? (64.90 KB, image/png)
2014-06-13 19:51 UTC, Matt Reid
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Launchpad 1326132 0 None None None Never
OpenStack gerrit 99029 0 None None None Never
OpenStack gerrit 102180 0 None None None Never
Red Hat Issue Tracker OSP-16464 0 None None None 2022-07-09 07:00:20 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2014:1335 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: python-django-horizon security and bug fix update 2014-09-30 21:18:31 UTC

Description Matt Reid 2014-06-13 19:49:09 UTC
Description of problem:
If I'm manually adding security rules to a security group, I don't think it's unreasonable for me to have the table sorted on Port or Protocol while I'm building out the group, but if I have the table sorted, each time you add a new rule, it reverts to the default sort of the table. (Side question, how is the table sorted by default? It doesn't appear to be port or direction or protocol, or ether type, or remote, or even when the rule was created. It just looks like a jumbled mess, hence why I want to keep it sorted...)

If I have the table sorted on Port, so I can keep track of which ones I've added already easily, it would be great if Horizon was smart enough to keep the sort applied, and just add the new rule, rather than forcing me to resort the table again, click add, create the rule, sort the table again, etc etc.

It would also be nice if there was a table sort indicator, but that's probably a topic for another bug :)

Comment 1 Matt Reid 2014-06-13 19:50:08 UTC
Created attachment 908695 [details]
Default view of ports in an Icehouse instance

Comment 2 Matt Reid 2014-06-13 19:50:49 UTC
Created attachment 908696 [details]
Same rules as other Icehouse instance, default view when you open up the group

Comment 3 Matt Reid 2014-06-13 19:51:21 UTC
Created attachment 908697 [details]
What is the sort here?

Comment 4 Julie Pichon 2014-06-24 09:31:34 UTC
Fixed in Juno upstream, may want to consider for backport.

Comment 7 Julie Pichon 2014-09-04 13:44:37 UTC
Looking at the Launchpad status, looks like this should be included in the 2014.1.2 rebase (bug 1127430). Tweaking the flags to indicate so.

Comment 9 Ido Ovadia 2014-09-21 15:04:50 UTC
Verified
========
python-django-horizon-2014.1.2-2.el7ost.noarch

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2014-09-30 17:18:43 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1335.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.