Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 1109597 - [RFE][Tracker][Dalton] Allow shared and local storage in the same DataCenter
[RFE][Tracker][Dalton] Allow shared and local storage in the same DataCenter
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-engine (Show other bugs)
unspecified
Unspecified Unspecified
high Severity high
: ovirt-4.2.6
: ---
Assigned To: Sahina Bose
SATHEESARAN
: FutureFeature, Tracking
: 1414166 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1134318
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2014-06-15 15:21 EDT by Itamar Heim
Modified: 2018-09-04 09:42 EDT (History)
24 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Technology Preview
Doc Text:
This release allows the creation of single-brick Gluster volumes to enable local storage to be used as a storage domain for shared data centers. As a result, both local storage and shared storage can be used. This feature is a Tech Preview.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-09-04 09:41:42 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: Gluster
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
sherold: Triaged+

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 141623 None None None Never
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:2623 None None None 2018-09-04 09:42 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Itamar Heim 2014-06-15 15:21:54 EDT 
Multiple Storage Domains are available in 3.4 via 1052318.
This RFE is to track mixing local and shared storage domains.
some details are in bug 757291
Comment 4 Sven Kieske 2014-09-25 10:47:08 EDT 
BZ 757291 is marked as private, could you open it to the public?
Comment 5 Itamar Heim 2014-11-30 08:02:16 EST 
(In reply to Sven Kieske from comment #4)
> BZ 757291 is marked as private, could you open it to the public?

bug 757291 tracked the request for both allowing mixed shared types (available since 3.4) and local. this was split to track allowing local with shared, now that mixed shared is available.
Comment 6 Yaniv Lavi 2017-01-26 09:54:41 EST 
*** Bug 1414166 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 SATHEESARAN 2018-07-30 02:55:14 EDT 
Tested this feature with ovirt-4.2.5

LocalDC could be created and single brick gluster volume could be used as gluster storage domain to store VM disks. VMs can be created out of it.
Comment 8 Yaniv Lavi 2018-07-30 03:31:40 EDT 
(In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #7)
> Tested this feature with ovirt-4.2.5
> 
> LocalDC could be created and single brick gluster volume could be used as
> gluster storage domain to store VM disks. VMs can be created out of it.

Why are you using localdc?
You should test on regular clusters. Mixing shared and local single brick and replica 3 volumes.
Comment 10 SATHEESARAN 2018-09-04 08:35:44 EDT 
(In reply to Yaniv Lavi from comment #8)
> (In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #7)
> > Tested this feature with ovirt-4.2.5
> > 
> > LocalDC could be created and single brick gluster volume could be used as
> > gluster storage domain to store VM disks. VMs can be created out of it.
> 
> Why are you using localdc?
> You should test on regular clusters. Mixing shared and local single brick
> and replica 3 volumes.

Yaniv, 

Yes this combination is also validated.
Used a regular shared DC with gluster storage domains with single brick distributed volume, replica 3 volume, arbitrated replicate volume
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2018-09-04 09:41:42 EDT 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2623
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.