Spec URL: http://npmccallum.fedorapeople.org/python-yubico/python-yubico.spec SRPM URL: http://npmccallum.fedorapeople.org/python-yubico/python-yubico-1.2.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Pure-python library for interacting with Yubikeys Fedora Account System Username: npmccallum
$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/python-yubico-1.2.1-1.fc21.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/python-yubico-1.2.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm ./python-yubico.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires
Fixed (but I didn't bump release for such a small change). Same URL. FYI, my erronious value is the default value of rpmdev-newspec.
Missing setuptools BR.
Why is setuptools required? The package builds fine on my system and I don't have setuptools installed...
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dBOArs + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1 + /usr/bin/tar -xf - + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/python-yubico-1.2.1.tar.gz + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1 + /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nAeT4H + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1 + /usr/bin/python2 setup.py build Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 3, in <module> from setuptools import setup ImportError: No module named setuptools error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nAeT4H (%build)
Argh! I did have it installed after all... Sorry! Fixed. Same URL.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Issues: ======= - Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 17 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck: BSD (2 clause) -------------- python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/release.py Unknown or generated -------------------- python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/doc/ykdef.h python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/setup.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/test/run.sh python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/test/test_yubico.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/test/test_yubikey_config.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/test/test_yubikey_frame.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/test/test_yubikey_usb_hid.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/yubico/__init__.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/yubico/yubico_exception.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/yubico/yubico_util.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/yubico/yubikey.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/yubico/yubikey_config.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/yubico/yubikey_config_util.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/yubico/yubikey_defs.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/yubico/yubikey_frame.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/yubico/yubikey_neo_usb_hid.py python-yubico-python-yubico-1.2.1/yubico/yubikey_usb_hid.py [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python-yubico-1.2.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm python-yubico-1.2.1-1.fc21.src.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint python-yubico 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- python-yubico (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) pyusb Provides -------- python-yubico: python-yubico Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/Yubico/python-yubico/archive/python-yubico-1.2.1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d0b830ae076e86802ac48f787663387fb3d0c5c7882a06ee835b4cb3e68256a4 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d0b830ae076e86802ac48f787663387fb3d0c5c7882a06ee835b4cb3e68256a4 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/bin/fedora-review -rvn python-yubico-1.2.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-i386 Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG --------------------------------- I though you'd fixed that python packaging macros, but seems you didn't. 1. BuildRequires: python-devel --> BuildRequires: python2-devel 2. %{python_sitelib}/* --> %{python2_sitelib}/* 3. Drop rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Fixed.
PACKAGE APPROVED.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-yubico Short Description: Pure-python library for interacting with Yubikeys Upstream URL: https://github.com/Yubico/python-yubico Owners: npmccallum Branches: f21 el6 InitialCC:
Strangely, I don't see the fedora-cvs flag. Anyone know how to set it?
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-yubico New Branches: f20 Owners: npmccallum
(In reply to Nathaniel McCallum from comment #12) > Strangely, I don't see the fedora-cvs flag. Anyone know how to set it? if you don't see them your not in the right groups and can not review and approve packages.
Dennis, that issue was resolved. I am just needing a new branch now.