Bug 1111360 - Review Request: python-parse_type - Simplifies to build parse types based on the parse module
Summary: Review Request: python-parse_type - Simplifies to build parse types based on ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Björn Esser (besser82)
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-06-19 20:40 UTC by Matěj Cepl
Modified: 2018-04-11 07:33 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-21 16:38:50 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
besser82: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
licensecheck.txt from fedora-review (2.12 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-20 09:25 UTC, Björn Esser (besser82)
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github jenisys parse_type issues 1 0 None None None Never

Description Matěj Cepl 2014-06-19 20:40:20 UTC
Spec URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp//python-parse_type.spec
SRPM URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp//python-parse_type-0.3.4-1.el7.src.rpm

Description:
`parse_type`_ extends the `parse`_ module (opposite of
`string.format()`_) with the following features:

    * build type converters for common use cases (enum/mapping, choice)
    * build a type converter with a cardinality constraint (0..1,
      0..*, 1..*) from the type converter with cardinality=1.
    * compose a type converter from other type converters
    * an extended parser that supports the CardinalityField naming
      schema and creates missing type variants (0..1, 0..*, 1..*) from
      the primary type converter

Comment 1 Matěj Cepl 2014-06-19 20:41:05 UTC
Scratch build is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7059925

Comment 2 Björn Esser (besser82) 2014-06-20 07:03:43 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 44 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/besser82/shared/fedora/review/1111360-python-
     parse_type/licensecheck.txt

     --->  LICENSE in tarball says "BSD 3-clause",  the only hint of a
           license in the source-files says "MIT".  This is case of
           need for license-clarification.
           https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification

[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
     /usr/lib/python3.4

     ---> properly owned by python3 on fc21.

[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
     /usr/lib/python3.4

     ---> properly owned by python3 on fc21.

[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines

     ---> unclarified licensing…

[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     python3-parse_type

     ---> false positive.  python3-pkg is meant to be used standalone
          with Python3.

[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.

     ---> one patch present, but only needed to remove obsolete dependencies
          when running the testsuite.

[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.

     ---> pkg is noarch and built fine on koji.

[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python-parse_type-0.3.4-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
          python3-parse_type-0.3.4-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
          python-parse_type-0.3.4-1.fc21.src.rpm
python-parse_type.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US enum -> menu, en um, en-um
python-parse_type.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cardinality -> carnality, cardinal
python3-parse_type.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US enum -> menu, en um, en-um
python3-parse_type.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cardinality -> carnality, cardinal
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/cfparse.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/builder.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/builder.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/cardinality_field.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/cardinality_field.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/paver_consume_args.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/paver_consume_args.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/paver_require.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/paver_require.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/pip_download.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/python_checker.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/parse_util.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/python_checker.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/parse_util.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/pip_download.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/paver_patch.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/paver_patch.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/parse.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/cfparse.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/cardinality.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/cardinality.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/python_bundle.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/python_requirements.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-34.pyo expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/python_bundle.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/_paver_ext/__pycache__/python_requirements.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python3-parse_type.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/parse_type/__pycache__/parse.cpython-34.pyc expected 3260 (3.4), found 3310 (unknown)
python-parse_type.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US enum -> menu, en um, en-um
python-parse_type.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cardinality -> carnality, cardinal
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 30 errors, 6 warnings.

---> bug in rpmlint.



Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint python3-parse_type python-parse_type
python3-parse_type.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US enum -> menu, en um, en-um
python3-parse_type.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cardinality -> carnality, cardinal
python-parse_type.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US enum -> menu, en um, en-um
python-parse_type.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cardinality -> carnality, cardinal
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'

---> spelling errors ignored.


Requires
--------
python3-parse_type (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python3-enum34
    python3-parse
    python3-six

python-parse_type (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python-enum34
    python-parse
    python-six



Provides
--------
python3-parse_type:
    python3-parse_type

python-parse_type:
    python-parse_type



Source checksums
----------------
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/parse_type/parse_type-0.3.4.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 3dd0b323bafcb8c25e000ce5589042a1c99cba9c3bec77b9f591e46bc9606147
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 3dd0b323bafcb8c25e000ce5589042a1c99cba9c3bec77b9f591e46bc9606147


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1111360
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG


===== Solution =====

NOT approved.  Please clarify the correct license with the authors / maintainers of the software and I'll give it another run.

Comment 3 Björn Esser (besser82) 2014-06-20 09:25:32 UTC
Created attachment 910723 [details]
licensecheck.txt from fedora-review

I attached the licensecheck for your convinience.

Comment 4 Matěj Cepl 2014-06-20 09:41:14 UTC
License issue filed upstream as https://github.com/jenisys/parse_type/issues/1

Comment 5 Björn Esser (besser82) 2014-07-21 11:56:29 UTC
Bedides the unclarified license, there are no other issues.  I watch the licensing issue filed with upstream on github.

---------------------

Package approved !!!

Comment 6 Matěj Cepl 2014-07-21 12:13:43 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: python-parse_type
Short Description: Simplifies to build parse types based on the parse module
Upstream URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/parse_type
Owners: mcepl
Branches: f19 f20 f21 el6 epel7

Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-07-21 12:46:30 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 8 Matěj Cepl 2014-07-21 16:38:50 UTC
Rawhide build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=546202
License bug filed as bug 1121695
FTBFS on EPEL-{6,7} filed as bug 1121709 and bug 1121710


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.