Description of problem: dyninst build failure on ppc64le archi as reported by http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1902638 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dyninst-8.1.2-9.fc21 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. fedpkg clone -a dyninst 2. fedpkg mockbuild Actual results: === gcc -L../../../ppc64_linux/lib -Wl,-soname,libdyninstAPI_RT.so.8.1 -o libdyninstAPI_RT.so.8.1.2 V_libdyninstAPI_RT.o RTposix.o RTlinux.o RTheap.o RTheap-linux.o RTthread.o RTthread-powerpc.o RTstatic_ctors_dtors-ppc64.o RTcommon.o RTmemEmulator.o RTsignal.o RTthread-powerpc-asm.o RTspace.o -Wl,-z,relro -m64 -m64 -shared -ldl /usr/bin/ld: RTthread-powerpc-asm.o: ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 2 output /usr/bin/ld: failed to merge target specific data of file RTthread-powerpc-asm.o === Additional info: With the dyninst.ppc64le_ABIv2.patch provided as attachment able to scratch build on koji: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1905772
Created attachment 912793 [details] dyninst.ppc64le_ABIv2.patch
I presume this only fixes the *build* for ppc64le - have you tried running anything? Dyninst is the sort of package that needs specific architectural knowledge, so I doubt it will work on LE without further changes. (In fact, next time I rebase the package I intend to flip the spec's ExcludeArch to an ExclusiveArch, because a whitelist makes more sense in this case.)
(In reply to Josh Stone from comment #2) > I presume this only fixes the *build* for ppc64le - have you tried running > anything? Dyninst is the sort of package that needs specific architectural > knowledge, so I doubt it will work on LE without further changes. (In fact, > next time I rebase the package I intend to flip the spec's ExcludeArch to an > ExclusiveArch, because a whitelist makes more sense in this case.) you are right, I only tried a build that was in the list of failed in mass rebuild on ppc64le.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22
dyninst is now arch-exclusive. Can we close this bug?
Yeah, we can close it. If anyone wants ppc64le support, they should work upstream.