Bug 1114573 - [abrt] /usr/bin/python: update_refs(): python2.7 killed by SIGSEGV
Summary: [abrt] /usr/bin/python: update_refs(): python2.7 killed by SIGSEGV
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: abrt
Version: 20
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: abrt
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf...
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:a8e6e0c49e6af0c1bddab967999...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-06-30 11:24 UTC by Liam Proven
Modified: 2016-06-17 21:08 UTC (History)
14 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-01 05:43:50 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (95.25 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-30 11:24 UTC, Liam Proven
no flags Details
File: cgroup (156 bytes, text/plain)
2014-06-30 11:24 UTC, Liam Proven
no flags Details
File: core_backtrace (16.90 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-30 11:24 UTC, Liam Proven
no flags Details
File: environ (310 bytes, text/plain)
2014-06-30 11:24 UTC, Liam Proven
no flags Details
File: limits (1.29 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-30 11:24 UTC, Liam Proven
no flags Details
File: maps (9.17 KB, text/plain)
2014-06-30 11:24 UTC, Liam Proven
no flags Details
File: open_fds (350 bytes, text/plain)
2014-06-30 11:24 UTC, Liam Proven
no flags Details
File: proc_pid_status (910 bytes, text/plain)
2014-06-30 11:24 UTC, Liam Proven
no flags Details

Description Liam Proven 2014-06-30 11:24:14 UTC
Version-Release number of selected component:
abrt-2.2.1-1.fc20

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.2.2
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/abrt-action-notify -d /var/tmp/abrt/ccpp-2014-05-09-13:41:42-2483
crash_function: update_refs
dso_list:       
executable:     /usr/bin/python2.7
exploitable:    
kernel:         3.14.2-200.fc20.x86_64
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            0
var_log_messages: 

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
 #0 update_refs at /usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Modules/gcmodule.c:400
 #1 collect at /usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Modules/gcmodule.c:998
 #2 collect_generations at /usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Modules/gcmodule.c:1124
 #3 _PyObject_GC_Malloc at /usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Modules/gcmodule.c:1585
 #4 _PyObject_GC_NewVar at /usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Modules/gcmodule.c:1605
 #5 PyTuple_New at /usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Objects/tupleobject.c:106
 #6 PyTuple_Pack at /usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Objects/tupleobject.c:210
 #7 PyType_Ready at /usr/src/debug/Python-2.7.5/Objects/typeobject.c:4025
 #8 dbus_py_init_string_types at ../../_dbus_bindings/string.c:345
 #9 init_dbus_bindings at ../../_dbus_bindings/module.c:272

Potential duplicate: bug 735662

Comment 1 Liam Proven 2014-06-30 11:24:19 UTC
Created attachment 913339 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Liam Proven 2014-06-30 11:24:20 UTC
Created attachment 913340 [details]
File: cgroup

Comment 3 Liam Proven 2014-06-30 11:24:23 UTC
Created attachment 913341 [details]
File: core_backtrace

Comment 4 Liam Proven 2014-06-30 11:24:25 UTC
Created attachment 913342 [details]
File: environ

Comment 5 Liam Proven 2014-06-30 11:24:27 UTC
Created attachment 913343 [details]
File: limits

Comment 6 Liam Proven 2014-06-30 11:24:29 UTC
Created attachment 913344 [details]
File: maps

Comment 7 Liam Proven 2014-06-30 11:24:32 UTC
Created attachment 913345 [details]
File: open_fds

Comment 8 Liam Proven 2014-06-30 11:24:34 UTC
Created attachment 913346 [details]
File: proc_pid_status

Comment 9 Jakub Filak 2014-06-30 12:24:14 UTC
Hello, thank you for taking the time report this crash. The crash looks like a bug in Python itself and it appears that your Python isn't healthy (these reports bug #1114575 and bug #1114577 look like a bug in Python too). Did you report more Python crashes recently?

Comment 10 Liam Proven 2014-06-30 12:29:12 UTC
This morning my machine reported a large number of crash logs - about 15 of them. I have never had so many at once before.

I reported them all at once. I do not know when they occurred - it may have been over the last week or more. I did not see these as they occurred - it may have been in the background. 

For what it is worth, I do a `yum update' every morning, and shut down fully every night. My machine is fairly vanilla GNOME F20, but I have installed Xfce as well and that is the desktop I use.

I am happy to provide any more info if I can.

Comment 11 Jakub Filak 2014-06-30 15:36:04 UTC
OK, if /var/tmp/abrt/ccpp-2014-05-09-13:41:42-2483 directory still exists, please run the following command as root user and report the results here (we will see whether the crash is reproducible):

$ /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/abrt-action-notify -d /var/tmp/abrt/ccpp-2014-05-09-13:41:42-2483

Comment 12 Liam Proven 2014-06-30 15:45:22 UTC
The directory is still there. When I ran the command, the Problem Reporting tool appeared again. It won't log a new fault, though; it says:

--- Running report_uReport ---
A bug was already filed about this problem:
Bugzilla: URL=https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114577

Comment 13 Jakub Filak 2014-06-30 16:27:45 UTC
(In reply to Liam Proven from comment #12)
> The directory is still there. When I ran the command, the Problem Reporting
> tool appeared again.

Yes, that is expected behaviour. The command emitted a DBus signal which the Problem Reporting tool is listening for.

> It won't log a new fault, though; it says:
> 
> --- Running report_uReport ---
> A bug was already filed about this problem:
> Bugzilla: URL=https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114577

This is also expected behaviour. ABRT won't let you create a new Bugzilla ticket for the crash because you have already created one.


Neither you nor I can reproduce the crash. So, if you don't mind, I would close this bug report as WORKSFORME.

Comment 14 Liam Proven 2014-06-30 16:31:30 UTC
Sure, no problem. If it happens again, should I avoid reporting it again?

Comment 15 Jakub Filak 2014-07-01 05:43:50 UTC
(In reply to Liam Proven from comment #14)
> Sure, no problem. If it happens again, should I avoid reporting it again?

No, please report any further crash you experience. But anyway, I believe that this particular crash won't happen again (it was probably caused by a rare
constellation of circumstances).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.