Bug 1114783 - anaconda reports no disks detected, yet libblkid sees them
Summary: anaconda reports no disks detected, yet libblkid sees them
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1114770
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-blivet
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Lehman
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-07-01 02:07 UTC by Chris Murphy
Modified: 2014-07-01 15:25 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-01 15:25:01 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
screenshot (127.93 KB, image/png)
2014-07-01 02:07 UTC, Chris Murphy
no flags Details
storage.log (150.64 KB, text/plain)
2014-07-01 02:08 UTC, Chris Murphy
no flags Details
anaconda.log (7.15 KB, text/plain)
2014-07-01 02:08 UTC, Chris Murphy
no flags Details
program.log (21.10 KB, text/plain)
2014-07-01 02:09 UTC, Chris Murphy
no flags Details
journal (464.00 KB, text/plain)
2014-07-01 02:11 UTC, Chris Murphy
no flags Details

Description Chris Murphy 2014-07-01 02:07:20 UTC
Created attachment 913601 [details]
screenshot

Description of problem: Anaconda "Installation Destination" Device Selection lists no disks. Yellow banner at the bottom says "No disks detected." There is an internal SATA SSD in this laptop, nothing unusual about the hardware.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
anaconda-21.45-1.fc21.x86_64
python-blivet-0.59-1.fc21.noarch


How reproducible:
Non-deterministic.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
No disks detected.


Expected results:
Should appear as a SATA device.

Additional info:
Bug 1114770 may be related. I get either this bug or bug 1114770 most of the time, maybe 20% of the time the SATA SSD appears in anaconda as sda.

lsblk shows sda and all of its partitions, so seems either anaconda or python-blivet are confused.

Comment 1 Chris Murphy 2014-07-01 02:08:23 UTC
Created attachment 913602 [details]
storage.log

Comment 2 Chris Murphy 2014-07-01 02:08:52 UTC
Created attachment 913603 [details]
anaconda.log

Comment 3 Chris Murphy 2014-07-01 02:09:13 UTC
Created attachment 913604 [details]
program.log

Comment 4 Chris Murphy 2014-07-01 02:11:12 UTC
Created attachment 913606 [details]
journal

journalctl -l -b -o short-monotonic

Comment 5 Chris Murphy 2014-07-01 02:16:14 UTC
21:56:21,805 INFO blivet: type detected on 'sda' is 'multipath_member'
21:56:43,641 DEBUG blivet: ignoring partition sda1 on multipath_member


OK so it probably is ultimately bug 1114770, but why does blivet sometimes ignore and conclude no disks detected, and other times it shows it as a multipath device?

Comment 6 Chris Murphy 2014-07-01 02:19:07 UTC
OK no this is somehow different because /dev/mapper doesn't have any multipath entries with this boot, whereas there are mpathc entries in /dev/mapper for bug 1114770.

Comment 7 Chris Murphy 2014-07-01 02:38:58 UTC
I think multpathd is just confused and it then confuses anaconda or blivet. Probably a dup of 1114770, but I'll leave it open in case the variable behavior is considered an anaconda or blivet bug.

Comment 8 Brian Lane 2014-07-01 15:25:01 UTC
We can only go by what the system tells us. multipath is saying that it is a valid device, although the setup seems to have failed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1114770 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.