Bug 1118348 - Deploying JBoss SRAMP with installer and then JBoss BRMS or BPM Suite on same EAP instance fails (layers.conf)
Summary: Deploying JBoss SRAMP with installer and then JBoss BRMS or BPM Suite on same...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Fuse Service Works 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: DT Governance
Version: 6.0.0 GA
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Mac OS
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: FUTURE
Assignee: Julian Coleman
QA Contact: Matej Melko
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-07-10 13:24 UTC by Eric D. Schabell
Modified: 2025-02-10 03:42 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-02-10 03:42:29 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Eric D. Schabell 2014-07-10 13:24:19 UTC 
Description of problem: In creation of this demo (https://github.com/eschabell/bpms-governance-demo) was installing SRAMP using installer (jboss-sramp-installer-6.0.0.GA-redhat-4.jar) I end up with eap 6.1.1 + sramp + dtgov on this instance with layers.conf set to "sramp". If I then install BPM Suite on top of this using the zip (jboss-bpms-6.0.2.GA-redhat-5-deployable-eap6.x.zip) it overwrites the layers.conf to "bpms" and sramp fails to start on boot. 

Modify layers.conf to "bpms,sramp" or "sramp,bpms" also fails.

The demo used above is now setup to install bpm suite on one instance of eap and s-ramp on another separate instance of eap to get the products to boot and work together.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.0.0.GA

How reproducible:
see above.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.see above.
2.
3.

Actual results:
Products fail to start.

Expected results:
Products should start and operate normally.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Gary Brown 2014-07-10 13:54:09 UTC 
Reassigning to productisation, as the community projects don't create or manipulate EAP layers.
Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2025-02-10 03:42:29 UTC 
This product has been discontinued or is no longer tracked in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.