Spec URL: http://data.hybridcluster.net/fedora-scratch/python-characteristic.spec SRPM URL: http://data.hybridcluster.net/fedora-scratch/python-characteristic-0.1.0-2.fc20.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomprince Description: characteristic is an Python package with class decorators that ease the chores of implementing the most common attribute-related object protocols. You just specify the attributes to work with and ``characteristic`` gives you: - a nice human-readable ``__repr__``, - a complete set of comparison methods, - and a kwargs-based initializer (that cooperates with your existing one) *without* writing dull boilerplate code again and again.
1. Summary: Say 'yes' to types but 'no' to typing! What's this??? 2. Changelog section need some love, take a shot at these examples: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs 3. BuildRequires: python-devel https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires 4. %{python3_sitelib}/test_%{srcname}.py %{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__/%{srcname}.*.py[co] %{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__/test_%{srcname}.*.py[co] A bit complicated, if you want to be lazy, just use this: %{python3_sitelib}/* 5. %{python3_sitelib}/%{srcname}-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info If you want to be more specific, use this: 5. %{python3_sitelib}/%{srcname}-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info Same applies to the python2. 6. 79 chars per line in the %description.
> 1. Summary: Say 'yes' to types but 'no' to typing! > What's this??? Upstreams description of the package. Spec URL: http://data.hybridcluster.net/fedora-scratch/python-characteristic.spec SRPM URL:http://data.hybridcluster.net/fedora-scratch/python-characteristic-0.1.0-3.fc20.src.rpm Koji URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7134561
> A bit complicated, if you want to be lazy, just use this: > > %{python3_sitelib}/* Not good, because it would include the __pycache__ directory that belongs into a different package. The ".*.py[co]" matches are fine but "*%{srcname}*" would have been okay as a lazy solution: %{python3_sitelib}/*%{srcname}* %{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__/*%{srcname}* > Requires: python Unneeded, because there is a better automatic dependency already: $ rpm -qpR python-characteristic-0.1.0-3.fc21.noarch.rpm |grep ^py python python(abi) = 2.7 > Requires: python3 Same here: $ rpm -qpR python3-characteristic-0.1.0-3.fc21.noarch.rpm |grep ^py python(abi) = 3.4 python3 > Koji URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7134561 Instead of a plain koji build, running "fedora-review -b 1119004" and looking into its various output files is highly recommended for new packagers.
Spect URL: http://data.hybridcluster.net/fedora-scratch/python-characteristic.spec SRPM URL:http://data.hybridcluster.net/fedora-scratch/python-characteristic-14.1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Koji URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7568684
I don't know if you're still working on this, if not please tell me, I'd be happy to take it. I can only do an unofficial review of the package, it should be more or less on the right way for now, clean it up a bit and update your files. (maybe use a better link). Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/robyduck/Pubblici/1119004-python- characteristic/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [?]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [?]: Package does not generate any conflict. [?]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [!]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. See attachment, also I saw some tabs. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [?]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [?]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [?]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3-characteristic [?]: Package functions as described. [!]: Latest version is packaged. Last version seems to be 14.2.0. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python-characteristic-14.1.0-1.fc20.noarch.rpm python3-characteristic-14.1.0-1.fc20.noarch.rpm python-characteristic-14.1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm python-characteristic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repr -> rep, reps, rear python-characteristic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kwargs -> awkward python-characteristic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US initializer -> initialize, initializes, initialized python3-characteristic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repr -> rep, reps, rear python3-characteristic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kwargs -> awkward python3-characteristic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US initializer -> initialize, initializes, initialized python-characteristic.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repr -> rep, reps, rear python-characteristic.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kwargs -> awkward python-characteristic.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US initializer -> initialize, initializes, initialized 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint python-characteristic python3-characteristic python-characteristic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repr -> rep, reps, rear python-characteristic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kwargs -> awkward python-characteristic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US initializer -> initialize, initializes, initialized python3-characteristic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US repr -> rep, reps, rear python3-characteristic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kwargs -> awkward python3-characteristic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US initializer -> initialize, initializes, initialized 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- python-characteristic (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) python3-characteristic (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): python(abi) Provides -------- python-characteristic: python-characteristic python3-characteristic: python3-characteristic
I've bumped the version to 14.3. I don't see any tabs, and all the spelling things are false-positivies. Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ClusterHQ/fedora-packages/2b3f62d57594440aee43fdba46a6775185f0b8e6/python-characteristic.spec SRPM URL: http://data.hybridcluster.net/fedora-scratch/python-characteristic-14.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Koji URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8451839
Ok, can you also update the changelog with the correct date?
Updated spec: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ClusterHQ/fedora-packages/master/python-characteristic.spec
Looks good now, please remember to rebuild also the SRPM. Thanks.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-characteristic Short Description: Python library that eases the chores of implementing attributes Upstream URL: https://github.com/hynek/characteristic/ Owners: tomprince Branches: f21 epel7 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
python-characteristic-14.3.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-characteristic-14.3.0-1.fc21
python-characteristic-14.3.0-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository.
python-characteristic-14.3.0-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.