Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 112 - Problems with http://developer.redhat.com/rhcn/browse/conventional/packageinfo.php3
Problems with http://developer.redhat.com/rhcn/browse/conventional/packageinf...
Product: Red Hat Contrib|Net
Classification: Retired
Component: rhcn (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: David Lawrence
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 1998-11-17 17:29 EST by Aleksey Nogin
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2000-05-15 12:19:57 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Aleksey Nogin 1998-11-17 17:29:05 EST
http://developer.redhat.com/rhcn/packageinfo.php3  has the
following problems:

 - In the package infromation Release, Size, Licence and
Summary fields are always empty. While Release number can be
gotten from the RPM file name and Summary is not that
important when Description is available, it would be nice to
be able to see Licence field and especially nice to see the
package size.

 - It has line

<CENTER><a href="maintainer.phtml">Back..<a

which has "</a>" missing before "</CENTER>"
Comment 1 Aleksey Nogin 1998-11-19 18:57:59 EST
Also, the Date field lists the date in some not very human-readable
Comment 2 Aleksey Nogin 1998-11-24 19:48:59 EST
Also, the Description field is displayed with no line breaks in it
which makes it less readable.
Comment 3 Aleksey Nogin 1998-12-04 20:23:59 EST
The new version of packageinfo.php3
still has some problems:

(1) "License" and "Summary" fields are empty

(2) "Build Date" field is not in human-readable format

(3) "Description" field has no line breaks in it

(4) Is is not clear information for what rpm (i386? src?) is displayed

(5) %changelog is not displayed (and rpm2html does not display it

(6) It would be good to have a a link to the rpm2html page for the
package on
Comment 4 David Lawrence 2000-05-15 12:19:59 EDT
RHCN has been discontinued and therefore this bug report is being closed. If you
have any questions about why this bug should not have been closed please direct
to bugzilla-owner@redhat.com. Sorry for any inconvenience.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.