Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1120072 - Remove legacy RHS 2.0 upgrade scripts from redhat-storage-server package for RHS 3.0
Remove legacy RHS 2.0 upgrade scripts from redhat-storage-server package for ...
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: redhat-storage-server (Show other bugs)
3.0
All Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: RHGS 3.0.3
Assigned To: Bala.FA
Prasanth
: Patch, ZStream
Depends On:
Blocks: 1162694
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-07-16 04:31 EDT by Rejy M Cyriac
Modified: 2015-11-22 21:58 EST (History)
13 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: redhat-storage-server-3.0.3.1-1.el6rhs
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-01-15 08:38:46 EST
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:0038 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Storage 3.0 enhancement and bug fix update #3 2015-01-15 13:35:28 EST

  None (edit)
Description Rejy M Cyriac 2014-07-16 04:31:15 EDT
Description of problem:
The redhat-storage-server for RHS 3.0 installs legacy upgrade scripts in /usr/lib/glusterfs/.unsupported/ , which came over from RHS 2.0

rhs_upgrade.py  rhs_upgrade.pyc  rhs_upgrade.pyo

1) These upgrade scripts are not relevant for RHS 3.0.

2) Their presence in the redhat-storage-server package for RHS 3.0 means that they would replace the more relevant upgrade scripts made avaiable through RHS 2.1U4, on an upgrade to RHS 3.0 .

3) These legacy upgrade scripts are based on RHN subscription, and may cause issues if run on RHS 3.0 which is based on newer RHSM/CDN.

If any upgrade scripts are to be shipped with the redhat-storage-server package for RHS 3.0, it should be the newer more relevant version made available for RHS 2.1U4

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
redhat-storage-server-3.0.0.0-5.el6rhs

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install RHS 3.0
2.Observe presence of rhs_upgrade.py, rhs_upgrade.pyc, rhs_upgrade.pyo scripts in /usr/lib/glusterfs/.unsupported/
3.Examine /usr/lib/glusterfs/.unsupported/rhs_upgrade.py

Actual results:
The redhat-storage-server for RHS 3.0 installs legacy upgrade scripts in /usr/lib/glusterfs/.unsupported/ , which came over from RHS 2.0 

Expected results:
Legacy upgrade scripts from RHS 2.0 are not to be present in RHS 3.0 .
If any upgrade scripts are to be shipped with the redhat-storage-server package for RHS 3.0, it should be the newer more relevant version made available for RHS 2.1U4
Comment 4 Bala.FA 2014-10-21 10:03:33 EDT
Patch is under review at https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/35210
Comment 5 Prasanth 2015-01-07 05:03:30 EST
Verified in redhat-storage-server-3.0.3.4-1.el6rhs.noarch

Legacy upgrade scripts from RHS 2.0 are not present in RHS 3.0u3

######
[root@snow .unsupported]# cat /etc/redhat-storage-release 
Red Hat Storage Server 3.0 Update 3

[root@snow .unsupported]# pwd
/usr/lib/glusterfs/.unsupported

[root@snow .unsupported]# ls -al
total 32
drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root  4096 Jan  7 12:08 .
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root  4096 Jan  7 12:08 ..
drwxr-xr-x. 7 root root  4096 Jan  7 12:08 gluster-deploy-0.8
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root  4096 Jan  7 12:08 gtop-1.0
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 13496 Dec 27 18:31 rhs-system-init.sh
######
Comment 6 Shalaka 2015-01-09 04:52:31 EST
Hi Bala,

Please add doc text for this bug.
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2015-01-15 08:38:46 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0038.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.