Bug 1121580 - Review Request: miniupnpd - UPnP IGD(Internet Gateway Device) daemon
Summary: Review Request: miniupnpd - UPnP IGD(Internet Gateway Device) daemon
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: NotReady
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-07-21 09:30 UTC by Christopher Meng
Modified: 2020-08-10 00:49 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-10 00:49:28 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Christopher Meng 2014-07-21 09:30:38 UTC
Spec URL: http://us-la.cicku.me/miniupnpd.spec
SRPM URL: http://us-la.cicku.me/miniupnpd-1.8.20140523-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description: MiniUPnP daemon is an UPnP IGD (Internet Gateway Device) which provides NAT traversal services to any UPnP enabled client on the network.
Fedora Account System Username: cicku

Comment 1 Robin Lee 2014-07-22 04:39:20 UTC
URLs response 404

Comment 2 Christopher Meng 2014-07-27 10:31:42 UTC
(In reply to Robin Lee from comment #1)
> URLs response 404

If you want to review something, find something valid.

Comment 3 Ralf Corsepius 2014-07-27 16:14:31 UTC
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #2)
> (In reply to Robin Lee from comment #1)
> > URLs response 404
> 
> If you want to review something, find something valid.

Your site is inaccessible, and you are joking about it - What shall we think about this?

Closing - Feel free to reopen this BZ or to re-submit this package, when your site is up again.

Comment 4 Christopher Meng 2014-07-28 01:28:29 UTC
Nope.

My site is always up but this one needs a tweak. Anyway don't close it unless I'm nonresponsive.

Comment 5 Ralf Corsepius 2014-07-28 04:46:04 UTC
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #4)
> Nope.
>
> My site is always up but this one needs a tweak.
Then fix it ASAP, better RSN!

ATM your site is still inaccessible (404)

> Anyway don't close it
> unless I'm nonresponsive.
Well, to me you appear to be cheating.

Should these files not be accessible within 24 hours, I'll close this bug as SPAM and consider to request banning you from Fedora.

Comment 6 Christopher Meng 2014-07-28 05:42:43 UTC
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #5)
> (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #4)
> > Nope.
> >
> > My site is always up but this one needs a tweak.
> Then fix it ASAP, better RSN!
> 
> ATM your site is still inaccessible (404)

It will be available today or tomorrow in my plan, actually. Because I don't want to post something in bugzilla and wait nearly a year to get a review, I put this in another cron job to let it only appear only someone would like to do a review swap. And I've found people on Saturday. I'm busy on Monday with dayjob.

> > Anyway don't close it
> > unless I'm nonresponsive.
> Well, to me you appear to be cheating.

This is not cheating. If someone posted something uncompleted, that's exactly cheating. You should count in those using unstable network or on holiday. 

> Should these files not be accessible within 24 hours, I'll close this bug as
> SPAM and consider to request banning you from Fedora.

If you do that, I will do the same. I have no interests wasting time with you. I'm not a child.

Comment 7 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:50:07 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 8 Package Review 2020-08-10 00:49:28 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.