Bug 11217 - Upgrade from 6.0 -> 6.2 fails on findUpgradeSet
Upgrade from 6.0 -> 6.2 fails on findUpgradeSet
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: installer (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Brock Organ
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2000-05-04 11:59 EDT by Cade Bodley
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2000-11-02 15:49:25 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Cade Bodley 2000-05-04 11:59:24 EDT
When choosing to upgrade the install fails while attempting to find
packages to upgrade.  The error message, more or less, is as follows:

File "/usr/bin/anaconda" line 342 in ?
  inff.run(todo, test = test)
File "/usr/lib/anaconda/text.py", line 1163, in run
  rc = apply(step[1], (dir,) + step[2],
File "/usr/lib/anaconda/text.py", line 317, in
in File "/usr/lib/anaconda/todo.py", line 730
packages = rpm.findUpgradeSet

If there was some way to tell which package it was choking on I'd jusr
remove that package.  I tried rpm --rebuilddb and that didn't make any
Comment 1 Jay Turner 2000-05-04 16:08:59 EDT
This message is generally a result of the root partition not getting mounted
during the upgrade.  Do me a favor and send me the output of "fdisk -l" for all
of the drives on the system.  In addition, please submit a copy of your
/etc/fstab file.
Comment 2 jmp 2000-05-23 17:06:59 EDT
Same here. This is a sparc (SS10), RH6.1 upgrade to 6.2.
Problem is in anaconda, fstab.py.
UFS partitions (or anything not "ext2" nor "swap") are _ignored_.

Problem is, only the root partition is ext2.
Others are UFS and NFS. Namely, /var/lib/rpm/ lives in UFS...
There are some lines of interest commented out. Line 520:
"# XXX code from sparc merge". I guess we sparc users were left out...
Comment 3 Michael Fulbright 2000-10-04 14:46:27 EDT
Do you happen to have any symlinks for directories like /tmp, /home, etc?
Comment 4 Brock Organ 2000-11-02 15:49:22 EST
I am unable to reproduce this behavior in test here ... please reopen if you are
having this problem with 7 ... thanks for your report!

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.