REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot : Handshake with glusterd is not proper.) posted (#1) for review on master by mohammed rafi kc (rkavunga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot :Handshake with glusterd is not proper.) posted (#2) for review on master by mohammed rafi kc (rkavunga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot :Handshake with glusterd is not proper) posted (#3) for review on master by mohammed rafi kc (rkavunga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot :Handshake with glusterd is not proper) posted (#4) for review on master by Vijay Bellur (vbellur)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot :Handshake with glusterd is not proper) posted (#5) for review on master by mohammed rafi kc (rkavunga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot :Handshake with glusterd is not proper) posted (#6) for review on master by mohammed rafi kc (rkavunga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot :Handshake with glusterd is not proper) posted (#7) for review on master by mohammed rafi kc (rkavunga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot :Handshake with glusterd is not proper.) posted (#8) for review on master by Avra Sengupta (asengupt)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot :Handshake with glusterd is not proper) posted (#9) for review on master by mohammed rafi kc (rkavunga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot :Handshake with glusterd is not proper) posted (#10) for review on master by mohammed rafi kc (rkavunga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot :Handshake with glusterd is not proper) posted (#11) for review on master by mohammed rafi kc (rkavunga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot :Handshake with glusterd is not proper) posted (#12) for review on master by mohammed rafi kc (rkavunga)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot: Handshake with glusterd is not proper) posted (#13) for review on master by Rajesh Joseph (rjoseph)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/9664 (snapshot: Handshake with glusterd is not proper) posted (#14) for review on master by Avra Sengupta (asengupt)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/9664 committed in master by Kaushal M (kaushal) ------ commit 82684f1efeb1685a1c794c1c875e3ac21f810481 Author: Mohammed Rafi KC <rkavunga> Date: Thu Feb 12 18:59:35 2015 +0530 snapshot: Handshake with glusterd is not proper If a snap is activated or deactivated, when a node is down, it is not retrieving the data properly during the handshake of glusterd With this patch, a version check will made when a glusterd is started running. If there is a mismach in version, then peers will exchange the healed data. Change-Id: I8bd2a347723db2194d3fa73295878b4dd2e9be5d BUG: 1122377 Signed-off-by: Mohammed Rafi KC <rkavunga> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/9664 Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Reviewed-by: Avra Sengupta <asengupt> Reviewed-by: Rajesh Joseph <rjoseph> Tested-by: NetBSD Build System Reviewed-by: Kaushal M <kaushal>
pre-release version is ambiguous and about to be removed as a choice. If you believe this is still a bug, please change the status back to NEW and choose the appropriate, applicable version for it.
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.8.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.8.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://blog.gluster.org/2016/06/glusterfs-3-8-released/ [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user