From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031016 Description of problem: Some Sun 21" monitors return no ddc name despite having otherwise valid DDC info. The monitors in question return ID=SUN0567 `ddcprobe --raw --monitor ` (hey, how about some ddcprobe docs!) returns : id=SUN0567 horiz=30-96 vert=48-160 width=390 height=290 The following patch substitutes the EISA ID for the name if no name is present: --- /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/rhpl/monitor.py.orig 2003-12-16 15:40:52.000000000 -0800 +++ /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/rhpl/monitor.py 2003-12-16 15:40:55.000000000 -0800 @@ -238,6 +238,9 @@ log("Ignoring bad ddcprobe output line |%s|", line) pass + if monName == None and monEisa != None : + monName = monEisa + return (monEisa, monName, monHoriz, monVert, physWidth, physHeight) def getDDCProbeResults(self): Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rhpl-0.121-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. run redhat-config-xfree86 Actual Results: * ddprobe returned bogus values: ID: SUN0567 Name: None HorizSync: 30-96 VertSync: 48-160 Expected Results: ddc values should have been used in spite of missng "name" attribute. Additional info:
Added to CVS, will be in next build.
Hi, I've just found this via Google. I'm a newbee having installed Linux (Redhat 9) for the very first time an hour ago! I have problems with the same monitor SUN0567 -or- my VIDEO card configuration (I have a DELL Dimension 1100 that seems to use an "82865G Intel Graphics Controler"). Any clues please? The quality of the display is very poor and everything is magnified on the screen ... my first night with Linux nothing is probed correctly! Ibex
Mass-closing lots of old bugs which are in MODIFIED (and thus presumed to be fixed). If any of these are still a problem, please reopen or file a new bug against the release which they're occurring in so they can be properly tracked.