Bug 112291 - deleted pre-edit buffer text reappearing with CannaLE
deleted pre-edit buffer text reappearing with CannaLE
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: im-sdk (Show other bugs)
1
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Akira TAGOH
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2003-12-17 01:36 EST by Jens Petersen
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-02-24 19:33:52 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
proposed patch (432 bytes, patch)
2004-02-24 04:27 EST, Akira TAGOH
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Jens Petersen 2003-12-17 01:36:37 EST
Description of problem:
When using CannaLE (through XIM) text, that has deleted from the
pre-edit buffer, re-appears the next time canna mode is entered.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
im-sdk-11_4-2.1

How reproducible:
every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 /usr/lib/im/htt &
2. LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 /usr/lib/im/httx &
3. export XMODIFIERS=@im=htt
4. gedit
5. Button 3 popup menu -> Input Method -> XIM
6. Ctrl-Space
7. Type "a", "s", "a", Delete and Delete.
8. Ctrl-Space
 
Actual results:
The hiragana "asa" is inserted into the buffer anyway

Expected results:
The deleted text should not be inserted into the buffer.

Additional info:
This doesn't seem to happen with newpy afaict.
Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2003-12-17 01:38:24 EST
Sorry, the initial description I gave was inaccurate:
the deleted text reappears when leaving canna (ja) mode
not when entering it.
Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2004-02-10 02:16:52 EST
This no longer seems to happen with recent package version.
Though currently pre-edit delete isn't working at all of course.
Comment 3 Akira TAGOH 2004-02-24 04:27:22 EST
Created attachment 97978 [details]
proposed patch

This problem should be fixed against this patch. please try and let me know.
Comment 4 Akira TAGOH 2004-02-24 04:54:13 EST
Please try 11.4-16, which will be available soon on rawhide.
Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2004-02-24 19:33:52 EST
Thanks, much better now.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.