Bug 1124474
| Summary: | [RFE] Provisioning/booting own images | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Beaker | Reporter: | Jaromír Cápík <jcapik> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | beaker-dev-list |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | tools-bugs <tools-bugs> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | develop | CC: | aigao, asaha, bpeck, dcallagh, ovasik, prarit, rmancy |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Documentation, FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-08-12 06:03:28 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jaromír Cápík
2014-07-29 14:46:56 UTC
beaker-import already allows importing arbitrary distros, under the control of the local lab operations team. This can be done independently of any centralised build process. However, the beaker-import command currently isn't covered in the online documentation - it only has local help on the lab controller. A man page was written as part of updates to the beaker-import command for bug 958590 (which has been postponed for the time being): http://gerrit.beaker-project.org/#/c/2526/1/documentation/admin-guide/man/beaker-import.rst Dan, perhaps we should split that project in two, and cover properly documenting the status quo under this bug, and then treat bug 958590 as an enhancement on top of that? Yeah this sounds like it is just a dupe of bug 911515 -- ability to tell Beaker in your recipe "skip the distro library, just use the distro tree from this URL I am giving you". As bug 1108455 points out in the context of image based provisioning, it's also possible to experiment with this for *guest* recipes by using a custom installation task (perhaps derived from virt/install). As Dan suggested, flagging this as a dupe of 911515. I've transferred Bill's suggestion over to that RFE, and noted some of the other things that would need to be taken into account. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 911515 *** |