Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1124724

Summary:	JDG640.Camel-jdg
Product:	[JBoss] JBoss Data Grid 6	Reporter:	Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant>
Component:	Camel-JBossDataGrid	Assignee:	Ion Savin <isavin>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Martin Gencur <mgencur>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	unspecified	CC:	bibryam, dmehra, dstahl, jdg-bugs, jpallich, mgencur, pzapataf, ttarrant
Target Milestone:	ER1
Target Release:	6.4.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1124710

Description Tristan Tarrant 2014-07-30 07:41:57 UTC

Requirement:
	

Support JDG 6.4 for caching on Camel routes in Fuse, replacing Ehcache. Support JDG 6.4 as an embedded cache (local or clustered) or as a remote cache in my Camel route.

 

- Make the camel-infinispan component [1] functionally on par with camel-cache component [2], for Camel Producer, Camel Consumer, and Camel Processor.  This work would happen in Apache Camel community.

 

- Productize this camel-infinispan into a camel-jdg component, which will ship with JDG (not Fuse). This component should be compatible with the version of Camel included in the current version of JBoss Fuse [3].

[1] Apache Camel: Infinispan

[2] Apache Camel: Cache

[3] Red Hat JBoss Fuse - Component Details - Red Hat Customer Portal

Priority:
	

P1

Status:
	

Partial commit - committed for the camel-infinispan component as available in Camel 2.13 (we might need to upgrade its Infinispan dependency, though). Re: the pair functionality with camel-cache component, we'll consider enhancing it, but can't commit to those enhancements

Originator:
	

Product Management

Responsible team:
	

Infinispan Engineering Team

Comments:
	

Attachments:
	

Interdependencies:

Comment 2 Divya Mehra 2014-09-03 14:29:05 UTC

Please name the component: camel-jbossdatagrid.

- Divya

Comment 3 Bilgin Ibryam 2014-09-23 10:59:11 UTC

Some thougths and clarifications:

 - camel-cache is a badly named component as it suggest that it is the default cashing component, but actually it is not. That component should have been named camel-ehcache and that will happen in Camel 3 I belive. That's said, there is nothing additional to do for camel-infinispan to integrate with camel-cache.

 - There was an idea for adding caching support to Camel DSLs, and we can think of how we can make infinispan as the default choise if the community does not objects to that.

 - If there are any additional enhancements that we want to do to camel-infinispan on the upstream, I'm sure the PR will get committed very quickly either by me or any other committer. 

 - I wonder whether a shorter name wouldn't be better, like: camel-jdg


Some areas for enhancements on the upstream:

 - add more operations to camel-infinispan component. For examlple hazelcast [1] has much more options.

 - Hazelcast has a tutorial [2] for using it as idempotent consumer. Camel-infinispan also has such a support and the demo is on my github, but that is not documented on camel confluence.

 - Implement infinispan based AggregationRepository for Camel. Hazelcast has implemetned it and I can see it being useful in my current engagement.


[1] http://camel.apache.org/hazelcast-component.html
[2] http://camel.apache.org/hazelcast-idempotent-repository-tutorial.html

Comment 4 Martin Gencur 2014-10-03 11:29:10 UTC

This feature was delivered as part of ER1. So I'm closing this bug. 

Functional issues of this feature will be reported in separate BZs.

BZs reported so far:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148703
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148802

Comment 5 Martin Gencur 2014-10-03 11:39:01 UTC

Regarding the rename. 
Divya, what would you say about "camel-jdg"? Just a suggestion. I'll create a separate BZ for this.

Comment 6 Martin Gencur 2014-10-03 11:43:05 UTC

Created https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149165

Comment 8 Martin Gencur 2014-11-04 07:35:54 UTC

The distribution has been delivered, hence I'm closing this BZ. Issues related to that distribution are filed as separate issues, such as:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156005
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148802