Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1124899

Summary: openstack-glance should depend on python-oslo-vmware
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Jaroslav Henner <jhenner>
Component: openstack-glanceAssignee: Flavio Percoco <fpercoco>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Jaroslav Henner <jhenner>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.0 (RHEL 7)CC: apevec, eglynn, fpercoco, mlopes, scohen, yeylon
Target Milestone: rcFlags: scohen: needinfo+
Target Release: 5.0 (RHEL 7)   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: openstack-glance-2014.1.1-2.el7ost.src.rpm Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
With this update, Image Service (glance) is now dependent on oslo.vmware in order to support the optional VMware store. This hard dependency was created due to the likelihood that the dependencies are already installed and due to the diminutive size of the package. As a result, the user experience is improved by no longer requiring a manual oslo.vmware install.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1125876 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-09-02 18:21:26 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1114623    
Bug Blocks: 1125876, 1248434    

Description Jaroslav Henner 2014-07-30 15:06:23 UTC
Description of problem:
It may be good to install python-oslo-vmware with openstack-glance because of t he RHBZ#1114623.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. 
2.
3.

Actual results:
packstack-deployed and hand reconfigured openstack-glance fails to start because of missing module

Expected results:
it started


Additional info:

Comment 2 Flavio Percoco 2014-07-31 06:30:21 UTC
I'm hesitant to make python-oslo-vmware a hard dependency because it's not enabled by default. I'm open to suggestions here.

@apevec we've had this kind of dilemmas with other packages, what do you recommend?

Comment 3 Alan Pevec 2014-07-31 08:27:25 UTC
Indeed, RPM is missing Suggests for optional dependencies, so they're left to the deployer or installer to take care of.

But strictly speaking, we should have Requires: python-FOO if we ship code which has "imports FOO" even if not loaded in the default configuration.

In this specific case, python-oslo-vmware runtime deps are nothing fancy, so it's fine to add it as a hard dep to openstack-glance.

Comment 6 Jaroslav Henner 2014-08-15 14:13:19 UTC
[root@jhenner-node-glance ~(keystone_admin)]# yum remove python-oslo-vmware
Loaded plugins: priorities
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package python-oslo-vmware.noarch 0:0.3-3.el7ost will be erased
--> Processing Dependency: python-oslo-vmware for package: openstack-glance-2014.1.2-1.el7ost.noarch
--> Running transaction check
---> Package openstack-glance.noarch 0:2014.1.2-1.el7ost will be erased
--> Finished Dependency Resolution

Dependencies Resolved

================================================================================================
 Package                     Arch            Version                     Repository        Size
================================================================================================
Removing:
 python-oslo-vmware          noarch          0.3-3.el7ost                @puddle          172 k
Removing for dependencies:
 openstack-glance            noarch          2014.1.2-1.el7ost           @puddle           64 k

Transaction Summary
================================================================================================
Remove  1 Package (+1 Dependent package)

Installed size: 236 k

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2014-09-02 18:21:26 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1131.html