Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1128558

Summary: [Docs] [Nova] [Article] Set up Ceph as a backend for Object Storage
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Summer Long <slong>
Component: documentationAssignee: RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.0 (RHEL 7)CC: adahms, dcadzow, ddomingo, sclewis, scohen, seb, srevivo
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation
Target Release: 7.0 (Kilo)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-11 05:30:14 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Summer Long 2014-08-11 05:31:25 UTC
Description of problem:
Need an article on how to set up Ceph as a backend for Object Storage

Comment 4 Derek 2016-08-22 12:23:24 UTC
I'll schedule it in as a work task for OSP-10 timeframe work.  We can likely put it in the cycle's "bucket 1" so that we are scheduling time to get it done early in the OSP-10 work cycle.

Comment 5 seb 2016-09-20 16:25:30 UTC
Wait, the subject is not clear and really confusing.

Are we looking at a document that describes how to configure OpenStack Nova to use Ceph to store virtual machine disks? (ephemeral disks).

Thanks!

Comment 6 seb 2016-09-21 15:36:07 UTC
As far as I saw here: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-openstack-platform/9/paged/red-hat-ceph-storage-for-the-overcloud/chapter-3-integrating-an-existing-ceph-storage-cluster-in-an-overcloud

We don't have an explicit documentation for this because this is being done by OSPD.

Comment 7 Don Domingo 2017-01-11 05:30:14 UTC
There's an ongoing BZ that covers this work (BZ#1387471). I'm closing this as a duplicate, then.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1387471 ***