Bug 1129414 - DR1's switchyard-2.0.0.Alpha1-redhat-1-features.xml could lead to users unintentionally deploying quickstarts to production server
Summary: DR1's switchyard-2.0.0.Alpha1-redhat-1-features.xml could lead to users unint...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Fuse Service Works 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: SwitchYard
Version: 6.1.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: tcunning
QA Contact: Matej Melko
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-08-12 17:24 UTC by Len DiMaggio
Modified: 2015-11-02 08:09 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
JBoss Issue Tracker SWITCHYARD-2264 Major Open DR1's switchyard-2.0.0.Alpha1-redhat-1-features.xml could lead to users unintentionally deploying quickstarts to product... 2015-08-04 13:58:29 UTC

Description Len DiMaggio 2014-08-12 17:24:02 UTC
Description of problem:

The switchyard-2.0.0.Alpha1-redhat-1-features.xml file in the DR1 build includes references to the switchyard quickstarts - for example:

    <feature name="switchyard-quickstart-camel-bindy" version="2.0.0.Alpha1-redhat-1" resolver="(obr)">
        <feature version="2.0.0.Alpha1-redhat-1">switchyard-bean</feature>
        <feature version="2.0.0.Alpha1-redhat-1">switchyard-file</feature>
        <feature version="2.12.0.redhat-610379">camel-bindy</feature>
        <bundle>mvn:org.switchyard.quickstarts/switchyard-camel-bindy/2.0.0.Alpha1-redhat-1</bundle>
    </feature>

Do we want to retain this approach - or change it to a model where each quickstart app includes it own features.xml file? It seems like each if quickstart was packaged with a features.xml file would be make for a better approach so that users could more easily copy/extend a quickstart into a customer app.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Keith Babo 2014-08-12 17:26:45 UTC
Having a separate features.xml for the quickstarts is probably not a bad idea.  One per quickstart might be too granular.  Won't production users install via the profiles we distribute with the product?

Comment 2 Len DiMaggio 2014-08-12 19:23:51 UTC
see:

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SWITCHYARD-2264


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.