Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/master/SPECS/python-sipsimple.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora20/python-sipsimple/python-sipsimple-1.4.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: SIP SIMPLE client SDK is a Software Development Kit for easy development of SIP multimedia end-points with features beyond VoIP like Session based Instant Messaging, File Transfers, Desktop Sharing and Presence. Other media types can be easily added by using an extensible high-level API. The SDK consists of several low-level components, Unix command line clients, a GUI client (Blink) and a server application (SylkServer). Fedora Account System Username: Hubbitus
Unfortunately it bundles pjsip, so we need wait pjproject package also. Upstream bugreport: http://sipsimpleclient.ag-projects.com/issues/2661
Any progress here?
I am trying to package this also, and stumbled upon this review request... Bundled pjsip in SIP Simple 3.1.1 seems to depend on ffmpeg, but ffmpeg is available only from rpmfusion. From Dependencies.txt: > * ffmpeg (libavformat, libswscale, libavcodec, libavutil) (>= 2.7) > * libx264 (recent snapshot) Not sure about libx264, it compiled fine without it and I think I did not install it, unless it got pulled somehow as a dependency. pjproject however doesn't seems to depend on ffmpeg libraries, not sure why. - Do you think we would have any legal issues in Fedora because of that? - Is bundled pjsip somehow modified to require this libraries?
The difference is that at least aconfigure.ac script have been modified to require ffmpeg libraries, and by the looks of it, some other things as well. So unbundling pjsip seems to not be an option.
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience.
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.