Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1131009

Summary: [RFE][engine-backend] Should be able to attach OVF_STORE disk to a VM
Product: [oVirt] ovirt-engine Reporter: Elad <ebenahar>
Component: RFEsAssignee: Liron Aravot <laravot>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Raz Tamir <ratamir>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: ---CC: amureini, bugs, gklein, rbalakri, srevivo, tnisan, ykaul, ylavi
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Reopened
Target Release: ---Flags: ylavi: ovirt-future?
ylavi: planning_ack?
ylavi: devel_ack?
ylavi: testing_ack?
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-07 08:56:05 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Storage RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
engine.log none

Description Elad 2014-08-18 11:40:41 UTC
Created attachment 927817 [details]
engine.log

Description of problem:
OVF_STORE is marked as shared even though its attachment to a VM is blocked by engine.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ovirt-engine-3.5.0-0.0.master.20140804172041.git23b558e.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to attach OVF_STORE disk to a VM


Actual results:
Operation is blocked with:

2014-08-18 14:27:16,570 WARN  [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.AttachDiskToVmCommand] (ajp--127.0.0.1-8702-13) [66736106] CanDoAction of action AttachDiskToVm failed. Reasons:VAR__ACTION__ATTACH_ACTION_TO,VAR__TYPE__VM_
DISK,ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_OVF_DISK_NOT_SUPPORTED

Expected results:
OVF_STORE disk shouldn't be marked as shared

Additional info:
engine.log

Comment 1 Liron Aravot 2014-08-19 11:12:35 UTC
currently the OVF store can't be attached to any vm. the intention is to enable to attach those disks to a vm/vms.

closing as WONTFIX.

Comment 2 Allon Mureinik 2014-08-19 11:20:34 UTC
(In reply to Liron Aravot from comment #1)
> currently the OVF store can't be attached to any vm. the intention is to
> enable to attach those disks to a vm/vms.
Let's use this BZ to track this intention.

Comment 3 Liron Aravot 2014-08-19 11:28:18 UTC
Allon,

a. shouldn't we update the description to reflect that it's a RFE?

b. This bug is targeted for 3.5, to which version is that RFE targeted to?

Comment 4 Allon Mureinik 2014-08-20 08:34:31 UTC
(In reply to Liron Aravot from comment #3)
> Allon,
> 
> a. shouldn't we update the description to reflect that it's a RFE?
> 
> b. This bug is targeted for 3.5, to which version is that RFE targeted to?
It's a boarderline RFE, but fine, let's go with that - retargeted.

Comment 5 Yaniv Lavi 2016-12-05 13:32:39 UTC
Are we planning to fix this? Should this be closed?
What is the use case?

Comment 6 Allon Mureinik 2016-12-06 12:25:16 UTC
(In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #5)
> Are we planning to fix this? Should this be closed?
> What is the use case?

The main usecase would be backup appliances that need access to this information.
HE may also have a use for it, although I'm not sure.

Comment 7 Yaniv Lavi 2016-12-06 23:33:45 UTC
(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #6)
> (In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #5)
> > Are we planning to fix this? Should this be closed?
> > What is the use case?
> 
> The main usecase would be backup appliances that need access to this
> information.
> HE may also have a use for it, although I'm not sure.

I don't know od any backup vendor or HE using or needing to use this.
Can we close until we get this request?

Comment 8 Allon Mureinik 2016-12-07 08:56:05 UTC
(In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #7)
> (In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #5)
> > > Are we planning to fix this? Should this be closed?
> > > What is the use case?
> > 
> > The main usecase would be backup appliances that need access to this
> > information.
> > HE may also have a use for it, although I'm not sure.
> 
> I don't know od any backup vendor or HE using or needing to use this.
> Can we close until we get this request?

Sure, we can always reopen if the usecase arises.