RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1131049 - Update SSL ciphers configured in 389-ds-base
Summary: Update SSL ciphers configured in 389-ds-base
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ipa
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Martin Kosek
QA Contact: Namita Soman
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-08-18 12:40 UTC by Martin Kosek
Modified: 2018-12-06 17:47 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ipa-4.1.0-0.1.alpha1.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-05 10:13:19 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2015:0442 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: ipa security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2015-03-05 14:50:39 UTC

Description Martin Kosek 2014-08-18 12:40:33 UTC
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4395

FreeIPA still configure the same (SSL and other) ciphers as in the beginning. Nessus and similar crypto detection tools mark some of the ciphers as low secure.

'''Reports on port 389, 636'''

Reported low secure SSL ciphers (< 56-bit key):
{{{
TLSv1
EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC2-CBC(40) Mac=MD5 export 
EXP-RC4-MD5 Kx=RSA(512) Au=RSA Enc=RC4(40) Mac=MD5 export 
}}}

Reported null SSL cyphers:
{{{
NULL-SHA Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=None Mac=SHA1 
}}}

Medium strength ciphers (>= 56-bit and < 112-bit key)
{{{
TLSv1
EXP1024-DES-CBC-SHA Kx=RSA(1024) Au=RSA Enc=DES-CBC(56) Mac=SHA1 export 
EXP1024-RC4-SHA Kx=RSA(1024) Au=RSA Enc=RC4(56) Mac=SHA1 export 
DES-CBC-SHA Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=DES-CBC(56) Mac=SHA1 
}}}

'''Reports on port 9443:'''

Medium strength ciphers (>= 56-bit and < 112-bit key)
{{{
SSLv3
DES-CBC-SHA Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=DES-CBC(56) Mac=SHA1 

TLSv1
DES-CBC-SHA Kx=RSA Au=RSA Enc=DES-CBC(56) Mac=SHA1 
}}}

Additionally, there was a report that httpd has Track and Trace methods enabled. This could be disabled with `TraceEnable` directive.

Comment 2 Namita Soman 2014-09-24 18:45:12 UTC
Please add steps to verify

Comment 3 Martin Kosek 2014-09-25 11:08:57 UTC
I can think of using nmap for listing the supported ciphers.

With ipa-server-3.3.3-28.el7.x86_64 I get:

# nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 636 `hostname`

Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-09-25 07:03 EDT
Nmap scan report for vm-067.idm.lab.bos.redhat.com (10.16.78.67)
Host is up (0.000091s latency).
PORT    STATE SERVICE
636/tcp open  ldapssl
| ssl-enum-ciphers: 
|   TLSv1.0: 
|     ciphers: 
|       SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA - strong
|       SSL_RSA_FIPS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA - weak
|       TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA - weak
|       TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_RC4_56_SHA - weak
|       TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC2_CBC_40_MD5 - weak
|       TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5 - weak
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA - weak
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_NULL_SHA - broken
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA - strong
|     compressors: 
|       NULL
|_  least strength: broken

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.12 seconds



With ipa-server-4.0.3-1.el7.x86_64 I get:

# nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 636 `hostname`

Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-09-24 19:06 EDT
Nmap scan report for ipa.mkosek-rhel71.test (10.16.78.57)
Host is up (0.000091s latency).
PORT    STATE SERVICE
636/tcp open  ldapssl
| ssl-enum-ciphers: 
|   TLSv1.2: 
|     ciphers: 
|       TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA - strong
|       TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 - strong
|       TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 - strong
|       TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_SEED_CBC_SHA - strong
|     compressors: 
|       NULL
|_  least strength: strong

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.28 seconds


Notice the difference in "least strentgh". Ludwig, do you know of any better mean to verify the cipher strength?

Comment 4 Ludwig 2014-09-29 07:05:58 UTC
no, the use of nmap looks good to me, but I don't know where nmap gets its classification of the cipher strength from.

Comment 6 Kaleem 2015-01-20 09:22:29 UTC
Verified.

IPA Version:
============
[root@dhcp207-214 ~]# rpm -q ipa-server
ipa-server-4.1.0-15.el7.x86_64
[root@dhcp207-214 ~]# 

[root@dhcp207-214 ~]# nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 636 `hostname`

Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2015-01-20 17:26 IST
Nmap scan report for dhcp207-214.testrelm.test (10.65.207.214)
Host is up (0.000053s latency).
PORT    STATE SERVICE
636/tcp open  ldapssl
| ssl-enum-ciphers: 
|   TLSv1.2: 
|     ciphers: 
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 - strong
|       TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA - strong
|     compressors: 
|       NULL
|_  least strength: strong

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.17 seconds
[root@dhcp207-214 ~]#

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-05 10:13:19 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0442.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.