Bug 113192 - Undefined symbol dmi_broken on RPM rebuild
Summary: Undefined symbol dmi_broken on RPM rebuild
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 126342
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: 1
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Arjan van de Ven
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-01-09 15:30 UTC by diego.santacruz
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 19:00:41 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Proposed patch: rename i2c dmi_scan.{c,h} to i2c-dmi_scan.{c,h} (13.50 KB, patch)
2004-01-09 15:31 UTC, diego.santacruz
no flags Details | Diff

Description diego.santacruz 2004-01-09 15:30:30 UTC
Description of problem:

When attepting to rebuild the kernel RPM (from the .src.rpm) the
dmi_broken symbol exported from arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c is not
versioned, leading to unresolved symbols in the powernow-k7 module
(cpufreq).


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.4.22-1.2140 (but also previous releases)

How reproducible:
Always

Additional info:

I tracked the problem to the fact that the lm_sensors patch adds
another file named dmi_scan.c in drivers/i2c/. Since both dmi_scan.c
files export symbols the modversioning stuff picks only one, and that
happens to be the i2c one (at least on my machine).

I solved the problem by renaming the i2c dmi_scan.{c,h} files to
i2c-dmi_scan.{c,h}. Although there is maybe a saner approach?
Patch next.

Comment 1 diego.santacruz 2004-01-09 15:31:57 UTC
Created attachment 96858 [details]
Proposed patch: rename i2c dmi_scan.{c,h} to i2c-dmi_scan.{c,h}

The patch is really simple, but has the drawback on renaming the module.

Comment 2 diego.santacruz 2004-01-09 15:48:04 UTC
On a second thought, maybe it's better to upgrade the lm_sensors
kernel patch? Currently is a 2.6.5, which is really old. Or is it too
much work?

Comment 3 Axel Thimm 2004-02-24 10:17:48 UTC
Later lm_sensors/i2c have the same behaviour. By coincidence I posted
on the same day about this on the lm_sensors list:

http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg06061.html

I just verified the same for FC1 2174 kernel and lm_sensors/i2c 2.8.4.

BTW patched FC1 kernels with recent lm_sensors/i2c support and the
matching lm_snesors userland bits can be found at ATrpms.net at the
cost of breaking powernow-k7.o

Comment 4 Dave Jones 2004-06-19 15:14:18 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 126342 ***

Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 19:00:41 UTC
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.