Bug 1133666 - Review Request: gom - GObject to SQLite object mapper library
Summary: Review Request: gom - GObject to SQLite object mapper library
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Elad Alfassa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-08-25 18:29 UTC by Kalev Lember
Modified: 2014-08-26 12:37 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gom-0.2.1-1.fc21
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-08-26 12:37:44 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
elad: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Kalev Lember 2014-08-25 18:29:34 UTC
Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/gom.spec
SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/gom-0.2.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
Description:
Gom provides an object mapper from GObjects to SQLite. It helps you write
applications that need to store structured data as well as make complex queries
upon that data.

Fedora Account System Username: kalev

Comment 1 Elad Alfassa 2014-08-25 19:56:49 UTC
Looks good, package is APPROVED.

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: gom-0.2.1-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
          gom-devel-0.2.1-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
          gom-0.2.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
gom.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) GObject -> G Object, Object
gom.x86_64: W: no-documentation
gom-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
gom.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) GObject -> G Object, Object
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint gom gom-devel
gom.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) GObject -> G Object, Object
gom.x86_64: W: no-documentation
gom-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
gom (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /sbin/ldconfig
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

gom-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    gom(x86-64)
    libgom-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    pkgconfig(gobject-2.0)



Provides
--------
gom:
    gom
    gom(x86-64)
    libgom-1.0.so.0()(64bit)

gom-devel:
    gom-devel
    gom-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(gom-1.0)



Source checksums
----------------
https://download.gnome.org/sources/gom/0.2/gom-0.2.1.tar.xz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 07a0481312c9d737c1843943b3af031d64415d51997f246c431f4fa2afd4d23b
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 07a0481312c9d737c1843943b3af031d64415d51997f246c431f4fa2afd4d23b

Comment 2 Kalev Lember 2014-08-25 20:34:50 UTC
Thanks for the quick review, Elad!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: gom
Short Description: GObject to SQLite object mapper library
Upstream URL: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Gom
Owners: hadess
Branches: f21
InitialCC:

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-08-26 12:17:50 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 4 Kalev Lember 2014-08-26 12:37:44 UTC
Package imported and built; closing the ticket.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.