Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1134581

Summary:	No support for domains/namespaces in oo-admin-ctl-app
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	thunt
Component:	Node	Assignee:	Luke Meyer <lmeyer>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	libra bugs <libra-bugs>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	2.1.0	CC:	jokerman, libra-onpremise-devel, mmasters, mmccomas, thunt
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1147646 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-09-23 17:36:25 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1147646
Bug Blocks:

Description thunt 2014-08-27 20:38:44 UTC

Description of problem:

oo-admin-ctl-app has no provision for specifying the domain when defining an application to be operated on.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.1.5

How reproducible:
Very

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create application test1 in default domain (say) jsmith
2. Create a second domain (say) mytestapps
3. Create application test1 in mytestapps domain
4. Use oo-admin-ctl-app to (say) destroy an application. There's no way to specify which of the two "test1" applications is to be destroyed.


Additional info:
Enhancement suggestion - Also allow application to be defined by application UUID rather than domain/name

Comment 2 Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters 2015-09-22 22:21:17 UTC

I was going to mark this Bugzilla report as a duplicate of bug 1191238, but then I noticed the suggestion of allowing an application to be specified by its uuid.  Should we retitle this Bugzilla report to focus on that particular enhancement, or simply mark this Bugzilla report as a duplicate and be done with it?