Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1135290

Summary:	RHEL 6 sosreport integration for Satellite 6 Capsule server debugging
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Xixi <xdmoon>
Component:	sos	Assignee:	Shane Bradley <sbradley>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Miroslav Hradílek <mhradile>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.7	CC:	agk, ahumbe, bhamrick, bkearney, bmr, dkutalek, gavin, katello-bugs, katello-qa-list, lzap, mhradile, mmccune, sbradley, xdmoon
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	sos-3.2-16.el6	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	The sosreport plug-in now enables capturing data required to debug Satellite Capsule Server problems.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1134109	Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-07-22 06:32:55 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1134109, 1135317
Bug Blocks:	1115190

Comment 1 Lukas Zapletal 2015-02-03 09:41:59 UTC

We have separated foreman-debug command out of the foreman RPM package, it's now distributed separately (in foreman-debug subpackage) and by default it will be installed on all Capsule servers.

Since sosreport already contains foreman-debug plugin

https://github.com/sosreport/sos/blob/master/sos/plugins/foreman.py

there is no need of any changes in sosreport I believe. When sos is executed on Satellite 6 main node, it calls foreman-debug to collect additional data. When sos is executed on Capsule node, it does the same from now on.

I suggest to close this ticket.

Comment 2 Lukas Zapletal 2015-02-03 09:44:51 UTC

To make this clear, the original foreman-debug command was capable of collecting information from foreman-proxy, the component that runs on Capsule server. In the upstream, usual deployment is to have the first proxy on the same server.

By installing the script on both Satelilite 6 and Capsule servers, we now collect all the relevant information. Both commands are the same with same (unchanged) options, so there is no need of changing anything in the sos report.

Comment 3 Bryn M. Reeves 2015-02-03 12:55:19 UTC

This bug is still required: the current foreman plugin only checks for the 'foreman' package.

Comment 4 Lukas Zapletal 2015-02-03 13:51:16 UTC

Oh haven't realized that you check against RPM packages. I was under impression that script is enough. Sure, that makes sense. FYI I issued an upstream change, this is the desired state now (and for Satellite 6.1 as well):

https://github.com/sosreport/sos/pull/488

Comment 25 errata-xmlrpc 2015-07-22 06:32:55 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1323.html