Bug 113559 - ssh privsep does not work with pam_limits.
Summary: ssh privsep does not work with pam_limits.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 111175
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: pam
Version: 1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jindrich Novy
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-01-15 10:58 UTC by Paul Jakma
Modified: 2013-07-02 22:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 19:00:46 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Paul Jakma 2004-01-15 10:58:59 UTC
Description of problem:

pam_limits is incompatible with privsep. If privsep is in use
following message is logged:

Jan 15 00:21:32 hibernia sshd[20396]: fatal: PAM session setup
failed[6]: Permission denied

And ssh login fails. The problem obviously being that pam_limits may
need elevated privileges itself in order to set limits.

To work around this either:

- do not use ssh with privsep

or

- chmod o-r /etc/security/limits.conf (

I notice Fedora seems to ship with the latter work around enabled.
However, this in itself is a problem as it silently ignores the limits
configuration. I'm not sure there is an easy solution to this - the
privilege seperated daemon (running as user) would need privileges
needed to set limits, possibly easiest solution would be for the
privsep'd daemon to retain CAP_SYS_RESOURCE until after it has
completed PAM authentication.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

pam-0.77-15
openssh-server-3.6.1p2-19

How reproducible:

100%.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run ssh server in privsep mode
2. configure pam_limits for ssh service make sure limits.conf is
readable to all
3. try to ssh to the server.
  
Actual results:

authentication succeeds, session setup fails, ssh session is dropped.

Expected results:

ssh session is created and user is able to login via ssh.

Additional info:

none.

Comment 1 B.R. 2004-09-02 05:32:31 UTC
I believe this is a duplicate of bug 111175.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111175



Comment 2 Jindrich Novy 2004-09-21 13:56:22 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 111175 ***

Comment 3 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 19:00:46 UTC
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.