Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1135722

Summary: samba4: patch fixing bug 9422 in upstream hasn't been backported
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Garri <g.djavadyan>
Component: samba4Assignee: Andreas Schneider <asn>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Namita Soman <nsoman>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.5CC: asn, jarrpa, sbose
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-09-01 12:23:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Sample patch prepared for rpmbuild none

Description Garri 2014-08-30 20:39:32 UTC
Created attachment 933011 [details]
Sample patch prepared for rpmbuild

Description of problem:

The bugfix (commit 1036f3d93311f7521ba2ef56a83d74a0b7ac2e36 in samba.git) implemented for bug report 9422 in upstream hasn't been backported to samba4-4.0.0 package.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install the latest available samba4 version (samba4-libs-4.0.0-63);
2. Configure simple public CIFS share;
3. Connect to share using GNU/Linux OS using cifs kernel module with unix extensions support (tested with Ubuntu 12.04.5 and Ubuntu 14.04.1);
4. Copy a file from the share to local storage.

Actual results:

Copy process hangs for 2-3 minutes and the error message 'CIFS VFS: Server has not responded in 120 seconds. Reconnecting...' appears in syslog.

Expected results:

Copy process process should complete without delays and errors.

Additional info:

I rebuilt the related SRPM package adding the attached patch, the problem is fixed.

Comment 2 Andreas Schneider 2014-09-01 12:23:19 UTC
Please use the Samba 3.6 package for file serving. samba4 is a tech preview and not supported in this case. The issue has been fixed in the standard samba package!

Comment 3 Garri 2014-09-01 19:14:20 UTC
Andreas, thank you for the advise and sorry for the time spent reading the report!

I didn't know that samba4 is tech preview package. I've been using the samba4 package for a year in production as a workaround of bug 1136101.

Comment 4 Andreas Schneider 2014-09-02 16:56:31 UTC
Talk to your support contact and ask him about details for hotfixes.

Comment 5 Garri 2014-09-03 17:22:35 UTC
Thank you for support. I'm not an RH customer. I've already fixed the problem using rpmbuild and patches provided. Just wanted to make CentOS distribution better.