Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1136423

Summary: Creating iSCSI or NFS Storage domains when master domain already exists adds these domains in maintenance mode
Product: [Retired] oVirt Reporter: Gilad Lazarovich <glazarov>
Component: ovirt-engine-webadminAssignee: Tal Nisan <tnisan>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Aharon Canan <acanan>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.5CC: acanan, amureini, bugs, ecohen, gklein, mgoldboi, rbalakri, sbonazzo, yeylon, ylavi
Target Milestone: m1Keywords: UserExperience
Target Release: 3.6.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: storage
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-22 08:17:57 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Storage RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
After master domain exists, subsequent iSCSI and Data domains come up in Maintenance mode
none
Logs from oVirt and 2 hosts, relevant timestamp around 18:30 on 2014-09-02 none

Description Gilad Lazarovich 2014-09-02 14:18:28 UTC
Created attachment 933808 [details]
After master domain exists, subsequent iSCSI and Data domains come up in Maintenance mode

Description of problem:
Creating iSCSI or NFS Storage domains when master domain already exists adds these domains in maintenance mode

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Add a master iSCSI domain
2. Add another iSCSI domain or an NFS Data domain

Actual results:
The second domain added it placed into Maintenance mode

Expected results:
The Storage data domain should become active and usable after their addition

Additional info:
See attached screenshot

Comment 1 Gilad Lazarovich 2014-09-03 08:15:55 UTC
Created attachment 933967 [details]
Logs from oVirt and 2 hosts, relevant timestamp around 18:30 on 2014-09-02

Comment 2 Sandro Bonazzola 2015-03-03 12:59:03 UTC
Re-targeting to 3.5.3 since this bug has not been marked as blocker for 3.5.2 and we have already released 3.5.2 Release Candidate.

Comment 3 Allon Mureinik 2015-07-07 14:39:31 UTC
This has been the behavior since forever - do we want to change this?

Comment 4 Yaniv Lavi 2015-07-21 22:15:54 UTC
(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #3)
> This has been the behavior since forever - do we want to change this?

Adding a SD is not a common task. Is there any value to not activate it? Any tasks a user might want to do prior to activate?

Comment 5 Allon Mureinik 2015-07-22 07:17:59 UTC
(In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #4)
> (In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #3)
> > This has been the behavior since forever - do we want to change this?
> 
> Adding a SD is not a common task. Is there any value to not activate it? Any
> tasks a user might want to do prior to activate?
Yes, e.g., configure credentials as per bug 1239266.
If we do change this, we should at the very least have a checkbox to allow choosing the non-default behavior.

Comment 6 Yaniv Lavi 2015-07-22 08:17:57 UTC
(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #5)
> (In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #3)
> > > This has been the behavior since forever - do we want to change this?
> > 
> > Adding a SD is not a common task. Is there any value to not activate it? Any
> > tasks a user might want to do prior to activate?
> Yes, e.g., configure credentials as per bug 1239266.
> If we do change this, we should at the very least have a checkbox to allow
> choosing the non-default behavior.

Closing as won't fix. We don't have a good reason to change the default here.