Bug 1136726 - [RFE] Support partial cleanup for dwh
Summary: [RFE] Support partial cleanup for dwh
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1169695
Alias: None
Product: ovirt-engine-dwh
Classification: oVirt
Component: RFEs
Version: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Yedidyah Bar David
QA Contact: Gonza
URL:
Whiteboard: integration
Depends On: 1060529
Blocks: 1169695
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-09-03 07:22 UTC by Shirly Radco
Modified: 2015-12-20 12:40 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
: 1169695 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-12-20 12:40:00 UTC
oVirt Team: Integration
Embargoed:
ylavi: ovirt-future?
sherold: Triaged+
rule-engine: planning_ack?
sradco: devel_ack?
rule-engine: testing_ack?

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Shirly Radco 2014-09-03 07:22:49 UTC 
Allow the user to relocate its dwhd (etl process) to a new host and give the option of using current db.

1. On setup of the new dwh, ask the user if he wants to replace currecnt dwh.

2. If the user accepts and the other dwh process is still running we want to signal it to stop , and address the issue of the cron job so it will not reactivate it again.

3. Also if the user chosen to you current db we need to make sure it will not be cleaned during engine-cleanup on the old host.
Comment 1 Shirly Radco 2015-01-04 11:19:42 UTC 
Clarification for Comment #1.

We want to support a flow that a user that wants to relocate its DWH will be able to run partial cleanup, that will allow him to keep current history DB.
And will also remove the uuid from the engine db. 

Then when the user will run engine-setup for the new dwh at the new location he will not be required to answer if he wants to replace the old installation and will be able to use the old history db.
Comment 2 Yedidyah Bar David 2015-12-20 07:29:10 UTC 
Can this one be closed as duplicate of bug 1169695?

In the past it was a downstream bug, but was recently changed.
Comment 3 Yaniv Lavi 2015-12-20 12:40:00 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1169695 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.