Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 1138145 - (CVE-2014-3619) CVE-2014-3619 glusterfs: fragment header infinite loop DoS
CVE-2014-3619 glusterfs: fragment header infinite loop DoS
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability (Show other bugs)
unspecified
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Red Hat Product Security
impact=moderate,public=20140912,repor...
: Security
Depends On: 1136712 1139098 1139110
Blocks: 1138149
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-09-04 03:16 EDT by Wade Mealing
Modified: 2016-03-04 07:21 EST (History)
13 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
A denial of service flaw was found in the way the __socket_proto_state_machine() function of glusterfs processed certain fragment headers. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted fragment header that, when processed, would cause the glusterfs process to enter an infinite loop.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-10-12 02:16:06 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Wade Mealing 2014-09-04 03:16:40 EDT
IssueDescription:

A denial of service flaw was found in the way the __socket_proto_state_machine() function of glusterfs processed certain fragment headers. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted fragment header that, when processed, would cause the glusterfs process to enter an infinite loop.
Comment 1 Wade Mealing 2014-09-04 03:34:59 EDT
Initial Report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136712
Comment 4 Garth Mollett 2014-09-10 03:43:41 EDT
Acknowledgements:

Red Hat would like to thank qinghao tang of Qihoo 360 Technology for reporting this issue.
Comment 6 Wade Mealing 2014-11-06 02:13:39 EST
Statement:

Red Hat Storage 2.1 receives only qualified Important and Critical impact security fixes. This issue has been rated as having Moderate security impact and is not currently planned to be addressed in future updates. For additional information, refer to the Red Hat  Support Matrix:

https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhs
Comment 7 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2015-02-28 09:35:48 EST
Hi,

(In reply to Wade Mealing from comment #0)
> A denial of service flaw was found in the way the
> __socket_proto_state_machine() function of glusterfs processed certain
> fragment headers. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted fragment
> header that, when processed, would cause the glusterfs process to enter an
> infinite loop.

I'm interested in checking the status if glusterfs in Debian is affected as well. The original report seems to be restricted, is there information/patches/affected versions which you are can share about the issue?

Many thanks in advance for any pointer,

Regards,
Salvatore
Comment 8 Martin Prpič 2015-03-23 05:38:05 EDT
(In reply to Salvatore Bonaccorso from comment #7)
> Hi,
> 
> (In reply to Wade Mealing from comment #0)
> > A denial of service flaw was found in the way the
> > __socket_proto_state_machine() function of glusterfs processed certain
> > fragment headers. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted fragment
> > header that, when processed, would cause the glusterfs process to enter an
> > infinite loop.
> 
> I'm interested in checking the status if glusterfs in Debian is affected as
> well. The original report seems to be restricted, is there
> information/patches/affected versions which you are can share about the
> issue?
> 
> Many thanks in advance for any pointer,
> 
> Regards,
> Salvatore

Hi!

Upstream patch that, among other things, fixes this issue:

http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8662/4

The infinite loop could be triggered if a fragment header of '00000000' was sent, causing the code in __socket_proto_state_machine() to loop indefinitely.
Comment 9 Siddharth Sharma 2015-10-12 02:16:06 EDT
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Storage 3.0
  Native Client for RHEL 5 for Red Hat Storage
  Native Client for RHEL 6 for Red Hat Storage

Via RHBA-2015:0038 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0038.html
Comment 10 Siddharth Sharma 2015-10-12 02:16:46 EDT
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Common for RHEL 7

Via RHBA-2015:0040 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0040.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.