Spec URL: https://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/openstack-zaqar/openstack-zaqar.spec SRPM URL: https://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/openstack-zaqar/openstack-zaqar-2014.2-0.1.b3.fc20.src.rpm Description: Zaqar is a new OpenStack project to create a multi-tenant cloud queuing service.The project will define a clean, RESTful API, use a modular architecture, and will support both eventing and job-queuing semantics. Users will be able to customize Zaqar to achieve a wide range of performance, durability, availability,and efficiency goals Fedora Account System Username: echevemaster
BTW, this is renaming of an existent package in fedora, openstack-marconi, which will to be retired once time that this be approved
Damned, this is the first time, that I'm reviewing a rename of a package that I have originally reviewed ! :o) One issue, it doesn't obsolete marconi at all, which may prove problematic for the upgrade-path. It may only affect few people using rawhide and the branched F21, nonetheless, the obsolete is harmless. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages
Hi, thanks for take this. I don't know why I'm not receiving bugzilla notifications in my inbox. weird... Are you receiving notifications from bugzilla, hguemar? I've fixed the obsoletes towards marconi. Here you go the changes. https://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/openstack-zaqar/openstack-zaqar.spec https://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/openstack-zaqar/openstack-zaqar-2014.2-0.2.b3.fc20.src.rpm
I did receive the notification, but in the past, I had the same issue.
Sorry for the delay, I had to be able to test it on a fresh install. I was able to test the upgrade path: OK There are two missing requirements: python-oslo-utils and python-oslo-i18n, please add them.
Sorry for not adding it before. I forget it add these requirements. Are did the changes: SPEC: https://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/openstack-zaqar/openstack-zaqar.spec SRPM: https://echevemaster.fedorapeople.org/openstack-zaqar/openstack-zaqar-2014.2-0.3.b3.fc20.src.rpm Tested on rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7566155
My apologies, I put this review in my DONE pile by mistake. Feel free to ping me when a review takes time. I redid the review just to be sure, I haven't missed something and it's ok. So I hereby approve this package into Fedora Packages Collections, please submit a scm request. You may include me in the CC. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/haikel/1138850-openstack-zaqar/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/logrotate.d [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: openstack-zaqar-2014.2-0.3.b3.fc22.noarch.rpm openstack-zaqar-2014.2-0.3.b3.fc22.src.rpm openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eventing -> evening, venting, e venting openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided openstack-marconi openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/zaqar/zaqar.conf zaqar openstack-zaqar.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/zaqar/zaqar.conf 0640L openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/zaqar zaqar openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/zaqar zaqar openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/zaqar/logging.conf zaqar openstack-zaqar.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/zaqar/logging.conf 0640L openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/zaqar zaqar openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zaqar-gc openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zaqar-server openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary marconi-server openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zaqar-bench openstack-zaqar.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti openstack-zaqar.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eventing -> evening, venting, e venting openstack-zaqar.src: E: specfile-error warning: bogus date in %changelog: Sun Sep 10 2014 Eduardo Echeverria <echevemaster> 2014.2-0.3.b3 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 14 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint openstack-zaqar openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eventing -> evening, venting, e venting openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided openstack-marconi openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/zaqar/zaqar.conf zaqar openstack-zaqar.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/zaqar/zaqar.conf 0640L openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/zaqar zaqar openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/zaqar zaqar openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/zaqar/logging.conf zaqar openstack-zaqar.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/zaqar/logging.conf 0640L openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/zaqar zaqar openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zaqar-gc openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zaqar-server openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary marconi-server openstack-zaqar.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zaqar-bench 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 12 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- openstack-zaqar (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh /usr/bin/python config(openstack-zaqar) python(abi) python-babel python-bson python-falcon python-iso8601 python-jsonschema python-keystoneclient python-memcached python-msgpack python-netaddr python-oslo-config python-oslo-i18n python-oslo-utils python-posix_ipc python-pymongo python-six python-sqlalchemy python-sqlite3dbm python-stevedore python-webob shadow-utils systemd Provides -------- openstack-zaqar: config(openstack-zaqar) openstack-zaqar Source checksums ---------------- http://tarballs.openstack.org/zaqar/zaqar-2014.2.b3.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : e88fe288f9d7fdc243dfe8453a5c8d72ead6487c9ef4d8a0af510901819a1ecc CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e88fe288f9d7fdc243dfe8453a5c8d72ead6487c9ef4d8a0af510901819a1ecc
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: openstack-zaqar Short Description: Message queuing service for OpenStack Owners: echevemaster flaper87 Branches: f21 InitialCC:
Thanks haikel
Git done (by process-git-requests).
openstack-zaqar-2014.2-0.3.b3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openstack-zaqar-2014.2-0.3.b3.fc21
openstack-zaqar-2014.2-0.3.b3.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository.
> Branches: f21 Please keep openstack-marconi in F21 that's Icehouse code and we're keeping fedora:openstack 1:1 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenStack#OpenStack Also Zaqar depends on python-oslo-utils which is Juno addition so it won't be pushed to F21.
According to comment 13 openstack-zaqar is >= f22 only.