Bug 1140396 - ec tests fail on NetBSD
Summary: ec tests fail on NetBSD
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: disperse
Version: mainline
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: NetBSD
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Xavi Hernandez
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1140847
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-09-10 20:47 UTC by Xavi Hernandez
Modified: 2015-05-14 17:43 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.7.0
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1140847 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-05-14 17:27:39 UTC
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Xavi Hernandez 2014-09-10 20:47:35 UTC
Description of problem:

Current tests for ec xlator fail on NetBSD. A simple 'cp' of a big file to a dispersed volume generates a file larger than expected. The same test on linux works fine.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): master

How reproducible:

always on NetBSD

Steps to Reproduce:
1. gluster volume create test disperse node{1..3}:/data/bricks/test
2. gluster volume start test
3. mount -t glusterfs node1:/test /mnt/test
4. dd if=/dev/urandom of=/tmp/data bs=1024k count=8
5. cp /tmp/data /mnt/test/
6. ls -l /mnt/test/

Actual results:

The size of the file is 8650752 bytes

Expected results:

The size of the file should be 8388608 bytes

Additional info:

Comment 1 Anand Avati 2014-09-10 21:47:47 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/8695 (ec: Fix invalid inode lock in ftruncate) posted (#1) for review on master by Xavier Hernandez (xhernandez)

Comment 2 Anand Avati 2014-09-11 20:39:59 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/8695 (ec: Fix invalid inode lock in ftruncate) posted (#2) for review on master by Xavier Hernandez (xhernandez)

Comment 3 Anand Avati 2014-09-19 07:30:03 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/8695 (ec: Fix invalid inode lock in ftruncate) posted (#3) for review on master by Xavier Hernandez (xhernandez)

Comment 4 Anand Avati 2014-09-19 10:05:39 UTC
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/8695 committed in master by Vijay Bellur (vbellur) 
------
commit 0ee0cfae80f7b17115b78d76610b995edb1bfa8b
Author: Xavier Hernandez <xhernandez>
Date:   Wed Sep 10 23:43:07 2014 +0200

    ec: Fix invalid inode lock in ftruncate
    
    The fops 'truncate' and 'ftruncate' share some code and inodelk()
    was always made against the inode inside the loc_t structure
    instead of that of fd_t. Since ftruncate has the loc initialized
    to NULL, this fop was executed without any lock, allowing some
    concurrent modifications in the file size.
    
    Also changed the way in which 'fop' and 'ffop' are differentiated
    in shared code. Now it uses 'id' field instead of checking if 'fd'
    is NULL.
    
    Change-Id: Ibd18accf2652193b395a841b9029729e5f4867c6
    BUG: 1140396
    Signed-off-by: Xavier Hernandez <xhernandez>
    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/8695
    Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com>
    Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur>

Comment 5 Niels de Vos 2015-05-14 17:27:39 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.7.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.devel/10939
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user

Comment 6 Niels de Vos 2015-05-14 17:35:36 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.7.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.devel/10939
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user

Comment 7 Niels de Vos 2015-05-14 17:37:57 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.7.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.devel/10939
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user

Comment 8 Niels de Vos 2015-05-14 17:43:42 UTC
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.0, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.7.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.devel/10939
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.