Description of problem: ======================= DHT + rebalance :- skipped file count is always 'zero' even though rebalance has skipped many files . Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ============================================================= 3.6.0.28-1.el6rhs.x86_64 How reproducible: ================= always Steps to Reproduce: =================== 1. create and start distributed volume. 2. mount it and create few files and Directory inside it. 3. add bricks and start rebalance without force option. 4. once rebalance is done check status which has '0' in skipped colum. 5. check rebalance log and it says is has skipped many files [root@dht18 ~]# gluster volume rebalance screw status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in secs --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ -------------- localhost 458 360.0MB 3724 0 0 completed 117.00 10.70.44.66 688 480.0MB 4023 0 0 completed 141.00 dht17.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com 408 336.0MB 3768 0 0 completed 121.00 dht19.lab.eng.blr.redhat.com 341 168.0MB 3282 0 0 completed 120.00 volume rebalance: screw: success: [root@dht18 ~]# grep 'MSGID: 109023' /var/log/glusterfs/screw-rebalance.log | wc -l 55 log snippet:- [2014-09-11 00:08:02.447989] W [MSGID: 109023] [dht-rebalance.c:547:__dht_check_free_space] 0-screw-dht: data movement attempted from node (screw-client-2) with higher disk space to a node (screw-client-4) with lesser disk space (/new/f62-101) [2014-09-11 00:08:02.476873] W [MSGID: 109023] [dht-rebalance.c:547:__dht_check_free_space] 0-screw-dht: data movement attempted from node (screw-client-2) with higher disk space to a node (screw-client-4) with lesser disk space (/new/f72-101) [2014-09-11 00:08:03.118416] W [MSGID: 109023] [dht-rebalance.c:547:__dht_check_free_space] 0-screw-dht: data movement attempted from node (screw-client-12) with higher disk space to a node (screw-client-11) with lesser disk space (/new/f66-101) Actual results: =============== It is always showing '0' in skipped count
Nithya, Can you please review the edited doc text for the known issue and sign off?
Nithya, Could you review the edited doc text and sign-off?
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0038.html