Bug 1140914 - Review Request: ghc-conduit-extra - Conduit adapters for common libraries
Summary: Review Request: ghc-conduit-extra - Conduit adapters for common libraries
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ben Boeckel
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: Ready
Depends On:
Blocks: 788515
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-09-12 03:16 UTC by Jens Petersen
Modified: 2015-07-19 16:41 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-19 16:41:13 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
fedora: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jens Petersen 2014-09-12 03:16:03 UTC
Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-conduit-extra.spec
SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-conduit-extra-1.0.0.1-2.fc20.src.rpm

Description:
The conduit package itself maintains relative small dependencies. The purpose
of this package is to collect commonly used utility functions wrapping other
library dependencies, without depending on heavier-weight dependencies.
The basic idea is that this package should only depend on haskell-platform
packages and conduit.

Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2014-09-12 03:16:06 UTC
This package built on koji:  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7570271

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2014-09-12 05:16:03 UTC
1.0 is a dummy placeholder package before conduit-extra-1.1.

Plan to move to 1.1 together with conduit-1.1.

The package will later replace *-conduit.

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2014-09-12 05:17:09 UTC
http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/conduit-extra

Comment 4 Ben Boeckel 2014-12-13 15:57:45 UTC
LGTM (should take another look once 1.1 is used though)

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
     upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 1 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/boeckb/misc/code/review/1140914-ghc-conduit-extra/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
     See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
     1.0.0.1 is the latest 1.0 release (1.1 to follow).
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ghc-conduit-extra-1.0.0.1-2.fc22.x86_64.rpm
          ghc-conduit-extra-devel-1.0.0.1-2.fc22.x86_64.rpm
          ghc-conduit-extra-1.0.0.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
ghc-conduit-extra.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US haskell -> Haskell
ghc-conduit-extra.x86_64: E: no-binary
ghc-conduit-extra-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
ghc-conduit-extra-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-conduit-extra.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US haskell -> Haskell
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Requires
--------
ghc-conduit-extra (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

ghc-conduit-extra-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /bin/sh
    ghc-compiler
    ghc-conduit-extra(x86-64)



Provides
--------
ghc-conduit-extra:
    ghc-conduit-extra
    ghc-conduit-extra(x86-64)

ghc-conduit-extra-devel:
    ghc-conduit-extra-devel
    ghc-conduit-extra-devel(x86-64)
    ghc-conduit-extra-static



Source checksums
----------------
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/conduit-extra-1.0.0.1/conduit-extra-1.0.0.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : ea5d045ea103f85993caf1b04faf615f75b822cce9c06130ac9190863a235547
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ea5d045ea103f85993caf1b04faf615f75b822cce9c06130ac9190863a235547


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --mock-config fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bb-tmpfs --bug 1140914
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Haskell, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2014-12-15 07:12:58 UTC
Thank you for the review.


New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: ghc-conduit-extra
Short Description: Conduit adapters for common libraries
Upstream URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/conduit-extra
Owners: petersen
Branches: f21 f20 epel7
InitialCC: haskell-sig

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-12-15 13:22:01 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Jens Petersen 2014-12-16 02:36:08 UTC
Okay I will leave this open until the package is updated to 1.1 as
a reminder to check over the updated packaging. :)

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2014-12-16 02:52:28 UTC
ghc-conduit-extra-1.0.0.1-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-conduit-extra-1.0.0.1-2.fc21

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2014-12-16 02:52:35 UTC
ghc-conduit-extra-1.0.0.1-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-conduit-extra-1.0.0.1-2.fc20

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2014-12-16 02:52:40 UTC
ghc-conduit-extra-1.0.0.1-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-conduit-extra-1.0.0.1-2.el7

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2015-01-05 07:33:28 UTC
ghc-conduit-extra-1.0.0.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2015-01-07 01:28:09 UTC
ghc-conduit-extra-1.0.0.1-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2015-01-09 03:01:06 UTC
ghc-conduit-extra-1.0.0.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.

Comment 14 Jens Petersen 2015-03-03 16:31:08 UTC
Okay I just pushed conduit-extra-1.1 to pkg git master earlier, if want to have
a look and check things look in order? :)

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ghc-conduit-extra.git/commit/?id=ead8e868e40734791d62a2431d765c7e4f24c7ff

Comment 16 Jens Petersen 2015-06-28 10:13:22 UTC
Ben, any objections to closing this?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.