Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 114102 - No i386 version of libfl avaialble in AMD64 distribution
No i386 version of libfl avaialble in AMD64 distribution
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: distribution (Show other bugs)
x86_64 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: dff
Depends On:
Blocks: 126849
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2004-01-22 12:12 EST by Göran Uddeborg
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-10-29 17:52:18 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Göran Uddeborg 2004-01-22 12:12:16 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030922

Description of problem:
The AMD64 distribution does not contain any i386 versions of the
libl.a and libfl.a libraries contained in the package flex.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. /bin/arch

2.rpm --redhatprovides /usr/lib/libfl.a
error: file /usr/lib/libfl.a: No such file or directory

3.rpm --redhatprovides /usr/lib64/libfl.a
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2004-07-01 11:38:42 EDT
What are you building that requires building against flex?
Comment 2 Göran Uddeborg 2004-07-07 13:10:15 EDT
Nothing any more. :-)

We had an old application which did use yywrap from libfl.  When we
started building on x86_64 with i386 as target we encountered this
problem.  But we did some obvious trivial changes so we no longer do
link with -lfl.

It would still be needed to use x86_64 as a compatible development
platform, so I would still argue it is a bug.  But it doesn't have any
high priority any more from our point of view.
Comment 3 dff 2004-10-29 17:52:18 EDT
Closing not a bug per earlier comments, no plans to add 32-bit flex package to
x86-64 RHEL 3 distro at this time.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.