Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 114136 - Package totals off by one
Package totals off by one
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Paul Nasrat
Mike McLean
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2004-01-22 17:32 EST by Mike McLean
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-11-28 18:42:50 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
install.log (full_server-install-english-ftp-TUI) (49.64 KB, text/plain)
2004-01-22 17:34 EST, Mike McLean
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Mike McLean 2004-01-22 17:32:37 EST
* rawhide-20040122.mikem (0122 + new initrd)

Package totals in some installs are one higher that the number of
packages listed as installed in the log.

My first thought was comps, but there seems to be no comps package in
any of the logs, even the ones with correct package totals.  (Although
there is comps-extras).

Installs with correct package totals:

Installs with incorrect package totals:

I see no particular pattern offhand.
Comment 1 Mike McLean 2004-01-22 17:34:14 EST
Created attachment 97198 [details]
install.log (full_server-install-english-ftp-TUI)
Comment 3 Mike McLean 2004-01-23 18:26:22 EST
fwiw, FC2-re0122.0 had precisely the same testcases encounter the error.
Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2004-02-17 18:43:01 EST
Still happening?
Comment 5 Mike McLean 2004-02-18 12:39:58 EST
The problem does not occur in the more recent FC2 trees.

However, the rawhide trees are another story.  It looks like every
rawhide tree since has manifested the bug.  Always the same three
testcases too: raid0_install, raid1_on_root, and RH-full_server.

Comment 7 Jeremy Katz 2004-02-18 13:39:47 EST
Aha, it's because rawhide trees don't end up with a comps.rpm while
the FC2 trees do.  And via ftp, I get a file for comps.rpm and so bump
my number of packages by one, even though it's ridiculous and

Low priority to actually fix this since it shouldn't happen with a
"well-formed" tree (and even when it does, it's cosmetic).  And I'll
bug notting/sopwith about getting comps packages built for rawhide.
Comment 8 Mike McLean 2004-02-18 14:37:18 EST
I've run some additional tests today.  Not all ftp installs produce
the problem.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.