Bug 1142508 - Review Request: rubygem-true - Testing framework for Sass libraries
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-true - Testing framework for Sass libraries
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Vít Ondruch
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 1132670
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-09-16 23:02 UTC by Mo Morsi
Modified: 2020-07-13 15:33 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-13 15:33:36 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mo Morsi 2014-09-16 23:02:37 UTC
Spec URL: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/rubygem-true.spec
SRPM URL: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/rubygem-true-0.2.3-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: Unit tests for maintaining test-driven Sass libraries.
Fedora Account System Username: mmorsi

Comment 1 Vít Ondruch 2014-12-22 11:03:18 UTC
I'm taking this for a review.

Comment 2 Vít Ondruch 2014-12-22 11:39:15 UTC
* The .spec file you are linking differs from the .spec from SRPM
  - But the difference is just subtle, so not a blocker.

* Update to the latest upstream version.
  - There is already available true 1.0.1. Please consider update to the latest
    upstream version.

* Test suite
  - Could you please execute the gem's test suite?
  - Since there seems to be circular dependency, I suggest you to follow the
    bootstrapping guidelines [1].
  - When the test suite is shipped in separate source package, I prefer to
    unpack it in the %check section. It does not pollute the original
    installation then.

* License file should be in main package
  - Please move the LICENSE.txt file into main package.

* Move the VERSION file into -doc sub-package
  - It does not look like the VERSION file is used for runtime. Please move it
    into the -doc subpackage.


[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Bootstrapping

Comment 3 Vít Ondruch 2014-12-22 12:07:27 UTC
> * Test suite
>   - Since there seems to be circular dependency, I suggest you to follow the
>     bootstrapping guidelines [1].
>   - When the test suite is shipped in separate source package, I prefer to
>     unpack it in the %check section. It does not pollute the original
>     installation then.

Actually, looking into compass-core, it might make more sense to boostrap compass-core instead of rubygem-true.

Comment 4 Vít Ondruch 2017-07-27 10:39:41 UTC
Ping? Any progress? This looks a bit stalled ...

Comment 5 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:50:37 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 6 Vít Ondruch 2020-07-13 15:33:36 UTC
Closing as stalled review.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.