Bug 1142746
| Summary: | Hosted Engine HA: [N/A] displayed for ppc host not in standard setup engine for ppc host | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Lukas Svaty <lsvaty> | ||||||
| Component: | ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal | Assignee: | Nobody <nobody> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Lukas Svaty <lsvaty> | ||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
| Version: | 3.4.1-1 | CC: | dfediuck, ecohen, gklein, iheim, lsvaty, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, yeylon | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | ppc64 | ||||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | sla | ||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2014-09-21 13:44:28 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | SLA | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1122979 | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Lukas Svaty
2014-09-17 10:37:24 UTC
Created attachment 938407 [details]
Screen of general subtab
Can you please explain what is the problem with having this string? If there's a hosted engine installation you will see the relevant information. Otherwise it is not available (NA). What is the problem? I would think that either it should be available in both rhevm-3.4 and rhevm-3.5 hosts general subtab, or in neither of them. Was there any reason to remove this information in rhevm-3.5? IMHO it would be better to remove it from rhevm-3.4 as it is in rhevm-3.5. Created attachment 939765 [details]
HE score in 3.4.2
The HE indication is available both in 3.4.2+ and 3.5.0 (attaching 3.4.2 sample).
The field is visible when application mode supports virt services.
So I do not see a problem here and what we current have works without any issue.
|