Bug 114346 - RFE to include afio in FC
RFE to include afio in FC
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: cpio (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Peter Vrabec
Brock Organ
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2004-01-26 18:14 EST by Jesse Keating
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-08-13 19:41:59 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Jesse Keating 2004-01-26 18:14:40 EST
Afio makes cpio-format archives.  It deals somewhat gracefully with
input data corruption.  Supports multi-volume archives during
interactive operation.  Afio can make compressed archives that are
much safer than compressed tar or cpio archives.  Afio is best used as
an `archive engine' in a backup script.
afio is also a dep of mondo restore, so it will need to be included.

I have been making afio rpms for a while, originally based upon the
power-tools version, updated now to 2.5.

Comment 1 Jesse Keating 2004-01-26 18:20:48 EST
To go along with afio for mondo, a few other things are necessary. 
lzo and lzop which are on a different bug, and buffer.

This is a program designed to speed up writing tapes on remote tape
drives. After startup it splits itself into two processes.  The first
process reads (and reblocks) from stdin into a shared memory buffer.
The second writes from the shared memory buffer to stdout.  Doing it
this way
means that the writing side effectly sits in a tight write loop and
doesn't have to wait for input.  Similarly for the input side.  It is
this waiting that slows down other reblocking processes, like dd.

Comment 2 Rahul Sundaram 2005-08-13 19:41:59 EDT

Look into packaging this for Fedora Extras repository. If you have them packaged
there already, a proposal to fedora-devel list would be a good idea

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.