Bug 1145 - /etc/rc.d/init.d should really be /etc/init.d
Summary: /etc/rc.d/init.d should really be /etc/init.d
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: initscripts
Version: 5.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Lawrence
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 1999-02-13 08:34 UTC by Marc MERLIN
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
0 users

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 1999-02-13 22:03:58 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Marc MERLIN 1999-02-13 08:34:28 UTC
Gateway old bug report to bugzilla:

... and /etc/init.d/rc.[1-6]d/ should be /etc/rc.[1-6].d
What more is there to
say?

Dan Quinland (FSSTND/FHS maintainer) told me the story on
how RH ended up using /etc/rc.d/ in the first place (by
misunderstanding the original FSSTND).

However, RH should be FHS compliant, and as much as the
change will be painful, everything has to be fixed to be in
/etc/{rc?.d,init.d}.

RH 6.0 could implement this and have a link from /etc/rc.d/
to /etc so that old contrib packages can keep working.
Before that, however, the upgrade should move all the
contrib files in /etc/rc.d/rc?.d in /etc/rc?.d

Not only will this make RH more compatible with other RPM
based distributions (including debian if you use alien), but
also other Unices like Solaris and Irix, and I'm sure many
others.

I know, it's a big and painful change, but I think it's
really worth it.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 1999-02-13 22:03:59 UTC
We'll look into this for a future release of Red Hat Linux.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.