Bug 1145 - /etc/rc.d/init.d should really be /etc/init.d
/etc/rc.d/init.d should really be /etc/init.d
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: initscripts (Show other bugs)
5.2
All Linux
low Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: David Lawrence
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 1999-02-13 03:34 EST by Marc MERLIN
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-02-13 17:03:58 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Marc MERLIN 1999-02-13 03:34:28 EST
Gateway old bug report to bugzilla:

... and /etc/init.d/rc.[1-6]d/ should be /etc/rc.[1-6].d
What more is there to
say?

Dan Quinland (FSSTND/FHS maintainer) told me the story on
how RH ended up using /etc/rc.d/ in the first place (by
misunderstanding the original FSSTND).

However, RH should be FHS compliant, and as much as the
change will be painful, everything has to be fixed to be in
/etc/{rc?.d,init.d}.

RH 6.0 could implement this and have a link from /etc/rc.d/
to /etc so that old contrib packages can keep working.
Before that, however, the upgrade should move all the
contrib files in /etc/rc.d/rc?.d in /etc/rc?.d

Not only will this make RH more compatible with other RPM
based distributions (including debian if you use alien), but
also other Unices like Solaris and Irix, and I'm sure many
others.

I know, it's a big and painful change, but I think it's
really worth it.
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 1999-02-13 17:03:59 EST
We'll look into this for a future release of Red Hat Linux.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.