Bug 114551 – Remote connection - Max open sessions reached (NOT per host)

Bug 114551 - Remote connection - Max open sessions reached (NOT per host)

Summary:	Remote connection - Max open sessions reached (NOT per host)

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 113154

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	gdm (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	1
Hardware:	i686 Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Havoc Pennington
QA Contact:	Mike McLean
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2004-01-29 10:00 EST by Need Real Name
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-02-21 14:00:59 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Need Real Name 2004-01-29 10:00:18 EST

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6)
Gecko/20040113

Description of problem:
Gnome
GDM
Using X terminals to connect

After approx 10 days of use no client is able to connect to the server.

Fatal server error:

XDMCP fatal error: Session declined Maximum number of open sessions
reached

Even when there are no current connections.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
GDM Gnome

How reproducible:
Sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:
1.try to connecto to X on the server
2.Connection refused
3.
    

Actual Results:  Session declined

Expected Results:  Connection established

Additional info:

It would seem sessions are closing off correctly.

Comment 1 Mike A. Harris 2004-01-29 17:00:25 EST

This is not an XFree86 bug/problem, it is a bug in gdm, which is
known, and already reported in bugzilla.  I don't have the
bug ID handy, so I'm reassigning it to gdm, for the package owner
to triage.

Comment 2 Need Real Name 2004-01-30 04:56:24 EST

Thanks

Any pointers as to what I should look out for or log?

Comment 3 Bart Martens 2004-02-02 18:16:45 EST

Probably duplicate of bug 113154. Right?

Comment 4 Jef Spaleta 2004-02-02 19:45:59 EST


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 113154 ***

Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 14:00:59 EST

Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.