Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
I'm actually not sure what determines the order we display provided products by in the two tabs (All Available Subscriptions and My Subscriptions) that show that information, but they seem to follow different rules. This also holds true when comparing the provided products spit out by 'subscription-manager list --available' and once attached, 'subscription-manager list --consumed'.
Presumably, there's a difference in the logic we use? It's the same subscription, so I would hope the ordering provided by CP remains the same?
Seems like the product listing should be in the same order, and alphabetical would make sense to me.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
subscription-manager-1.10.14-7.el7
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open up subscription-manager-gui
2. Go to the All Available Subscriptions tab (assuming you're already registered)
3. Update the list to pull down subscriptions
4. Find a subscription that provides multiple products and observe the ordering of the products listed
5. Attach the subscription
6. Go over to My Subscriptions and look at the ordering of the provided products, it should be arranged differently now
You can do the same through cli using list --available and list --consumed
Actual results:
Products aren't in the same order
Expected results:
Products should be in the same order (and probably alphabetical, to keep things simple)
Additional info:
No sorting done on these at all. We could add that in all avail / my subs / CLI, but it could add a little processing time. In any case low priority, deferring to 6.7.