Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 114728 - Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:121 (nfs?)
Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:121 (nfs?)
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Arjan van de Ven
Brian Brock
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2004-02-01 15:48 EST by Bill Nottingham
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:41 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-06-28 16:42:53 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
A brief snippet of the kernel messages (116.48 KB, text/plain)
2004-02-01 15:49 EST, Bill Nottingham
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Bill Nottingham 2004-02-01 15:48:32 EST
Description of problem:

Serving up an NFS iso install (to only one machine) leads to
lots of the above messages, and the load average hovering between
5 and 12, depending on the amount of NFS traffic.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

Only did one install. It was painful enough. :)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. add an export for the ISO dirs
2. point anaconda at it
3. wait for it to mount the ISOs and start installing
Actual results:


Expected results:

Much less load on the server.

Kernel messages attached.
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2004-02-01 15:49:11 EST
Created attachment 97404 [details]
A brief snippet of the kernel messages
Comment 2 Dave Jones 2004-06-14 19:26:27 EDT
did this go away ?
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2004-06-28 16:42:53 EDT
Haven't tried an iso install as a server since then.

Will close, reopen if it recurrs.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.