RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1147989 - cibadmin -u yields a Timer Expired error when run on a non-DC node
Summary: cibadmin -u yields a Timer Expired error when run on a non-DC node
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: pacemaker
Version: 7.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Andrew Beekhof
QA Contact: cluster-qe@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-09-30 13:28 UTC by Radek Steiger
Modified: 2015-03-09 11:15 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: pacemaker-1.1.12-3.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-09 11:15:25 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1054490 0 high CLOSED RFE: Users & group functionality in pcs 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1054490

Description Radek Steiger 2014-09-30 13:28:08 UTC
Description of problem:
When running the 'cibadmin -u --force' command on a node which is not the domain controller, it will get stuck for 30 seconds and then returns "Call cib_upgrade failed (-62): Timer expired", while in fact the scheme version is upgraded correctly. This does not happen on the DC node.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pacemaker-libs-1.1.12-1.el7.x86_64
pacemaker-cli-1.1.12-1.el7.x86_64
pacemaker-1.1.12-1.el7.x86_64
pacemaker-cluster-libs-1.1.12-1.el7.x86_64


How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Check that the CIB version can be upgraded: pcs cluster cib | egrep -o '(validate\S+)'
2. Find out which node is the current DC: pcs status | grep DC
3. Perform the upgrade on node other than the DC:  cibadmin --upgrade --force


Actual results:

[root@virt-042 ~]# pcs cluster cib | egrep -o '(validate\S+)'
validate-with="pacemaker-1.2"
[root@virt-042 ~]# pcs status | grep DC
Current DC: virt-043 (3) - partition with quorum

[root@virt-042 ~]# cibadmin --upgrade --force
Call cib_upgrade failed (-62): Timer expired
[root@virt-042 ~]# pcs cluster cib | egrep -o '(validate\S+)'
validate-with="pacemaker-2.1"


Expected results:

[root@virt-042 ~]# cibadmin --upgrade --force
[root@virt-042 ~]# pcs cluster cib | egrep -o '(validate\S+)'
validate-with="pacemaker-2.1"

Comment 3 Andrew Beekhof 2014-09-30 22:55:52 UTC
crm_report archive?

Comment 4 Andrew Beekhof 2014-10-01 05:09:15 UTC
Fixed upstream:  https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/93c872b

Is this really a regression though?
I don't think we advertised this command previously


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.