RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
The iscsi target service has a default port list, it would be nice if the ports could be addressed via '--add-service=iscsi' rather than explicit ports list.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):firewalld-0.3.9-7.el7.noarch


How reproducible:100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1.wish to open iscsi service, have to open by ports
2.
3.

Actual results:
must lookup ports for iscsi

Expected results:
can address by service name

Additional info:

Created attachment 947649 [details]
iscsi-target service

Will this be sufficient ?
Copy it into /etc/firewalld/services/ and restart firewalld.

That looks good to me, can we get it into the official package down the road?

Added upstream:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/firewalld.git/commit/?id=fddf73570d392f815942fc5915a5f7110ffa389e

*** Bug 1242392 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2422.html