Bug 1152244 - Review Request: unsafe-mock - A mock of sun.misc.Unsafe
Summary: Review Request: unsafe-mock - A mock of sun.misc.Unsafe
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW 1152249
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-10-13 17:21 UTC by Mo Morsi
Modified: 2021-08-10 04:36 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-08-10 04:36:45 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mo Morsi 2014-10-13 17:21:50 UTC
Spec URL: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/unsafe-mock.spec
SRPM URL: https://mmorsi.fedorapeople.org/staging/unsafe-mock-8.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: 
A mock of sun.misc.Unsafe for the JRuby build system

Fedora Account System Username: mmorsi

Comment 1 Michal Srb 2014-10-15 05:41:15 UTC
This package is a bit controversial, because it basically bundles sun.misc.Unsafe from JDK8. And it looks like it's not really needed in Fedora. If I understand it correctly, it's only a build-time dependency of JRuby. Upstream uses this JAR as a placeholder for JDK8's sun.misc.Unsafe class and they build JRuby against it. Since Fedora 21+ comes with Java 8 (only), wouldn't be easier to just remove this dependency from pom.xml file?

Comment 2 Mo Morsi 2014-10-16 18:07:59 UTC
Sounds reasonable (assuming the dep is satisfied by the Java8 in Fedora). Lets proceed w/ the other deps & try to build JRuby w/out this. If all goes well, can just close this issue.

Comment 3 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:50:49 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 4 Package Review 2020-11-13 00:46:19 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket.

Comment 5 Didik Supriadi 2021-07-27 04:32:10 UTC
Seems like the submitter account is disabled (?)
I will be closing this package review if there is no response in a week.

Comment 6 Otto Liljalaakso 2021-08-10 04:36:45 UTC
Closing this review request since submitter account is disabled.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.